We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Avoiding Stamp Duty surcharge on second property
Options

Bif
Posts: 4 Newbie
Hi all,
I live in employer owned accommodation during the week, and with parents at weekends. I own a property which I rent out and want to keep.
I now want to buy and live in a property with my GF (first time buyer - I realise this is irrelevant with regard to new SDLT rules). This will be my main residence, my previous one being my parents' house, so I am liable for the 3% SDLT surcharge.
We are looking at buying something for around £350k, resulting in an £18k SDLT bill.
What I'd like to know is, could we initially buy somewhere for say £150k, pay the £5k bill (3% surcharge as I will have gained a property), then sell it soon afterwards, buy for £350k, and only pay £5k on that (no surcharge as I will still have the same number of properties)?
How far could you go with this? Could you buy a <£40k property, live in it for a period of time, then trade up, avoiding the surcharge altogther?
I realise HMRC wouldn't look kindly on this but I'm just curious as to whether there are actual rules in place. Surely it has been covered somewhere; I have read the full guide and many forum threads and articles but couldn't find anything.
I live in employer owned accommodation during the week, and with parents at weekends. I own a property which I rent out and want to keep.
I now want to buy and live in a property with my GF (first time buyer - I realise this is irrelevant with regard to new SDLT rules). This will be my main residence, my previous one being my parents' house, so I am liable for the 3% SDLT surcharge.
We are looking at buying something for around £350k, resulting in an £18k SDLT bill.
What I'd like to know is, could we initially buy somewhere for say £150k, pay the £5k bill (3% surcharge as I will have gained a property), then sell it soon afterwards, buy for £350k, and only pay £5k on that (no surcharge as I will still have the same number of properties)?
How far could you go with this? Could you buy a <£40k property, live in it for a period of time, then trade up, avoiding the surcharge altogther?
I realise HMRC wouldn't look kindly on this but I'm just curious as to whether there are actual rules in place. Surely it has been covered somewhere; I have read the full guide and many forum threads and articles but couldn't find anything.
0
Comments
-
You admit yourself HMRC will take a dim view. Just pay what you owe - it is your choice to keep the rental property.0
-
You will need to keep the first property for at least 6 months.
You would need to factor into account estate agency fees (£2k?), extra legal fees and surveys.
It doesn't sound like you'll save much in the long run (if anything) and it'll be a load more stressful.0 -
In order to show them as two separate transactions, you would need to actually live in the cheap property for enough time. The expenses involved in an extra move include
- EA fees (extra sale)
- legal costs (extra sale & purchase)
- mortgage valuation fee
- high mortgage interest / ERCs if you end up with a fixed deal
- normal stamp duty on cheap place (if above threshold)
- removals van / packing costs
- renovation costs to make the cheap place habitable
- time to reregister address, mail redirection
- time to view, searches, apply for mortgage
- time to pack/unpack
- time in renovating / cleaning cheap place to be habitable
Also you'd be hard pressed to find two properties in a similar area with sufficiently different values (so expensive property is high enough that the stamp duty makes enough of a difference to cover the standing costs).0 -
youre barely going to save money doing that probably end up paying more in the fees and ercs0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards