We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Landlord threatening with forced entry
Comments
-
But doesn't it go both ways? Why won't the OP let the landlord in on that specific day? It could be anything under the sun, but if my friends' situations are anything to go by, it's because there's someone staying in the property (unauthorised and in breach of the lease) and they wouldn't have time to put away the inflatable mattress or whatever before the landlord rocks up with the new viewer. If in breach of the lease, I wouldn't start throwing provisions back at the landlord claiming breach on his part.
!!!!!!? Breach of the lease? Tenants pay for exclusive occupation of the property so they are allowed to have visitors. What clause in an AST have you ever seen that prohibits tenants from having guests?
If you read my posts you will see that I never accused the landlord of trying to breach the TA, quite the opposite in fact, but that the ideal solution is to meet somewhere in the middle.0 -
!!!!!!? Breach of the lease? Tenants pay for exclusive occupation of the property so they are allowed to have visitors. What clause in an AST have you ever seen that prohibits tenants from having guests?
If you read my posts you will see that I never accused the landlord of trying to breach the TA, quite the opposite in fact, but that the ideal solution is to meet somewhere in the middle.
Pixie, I was taking your point and working through its logic having read all the posts in this thread, not putting words in your mouth. I wasn't talking about guests; I meant the situation where the number of occupiers is limited but the tenants get in additional people (i.e. "tenants") who sleep in the living room or wherever on a temporary bed so they can hide it when the landlord comes round and pretend they're complying with the lease. You said we should ask why the landlord can't move the date, and I was simply wondering why the tenant/OP can't do that day - the questions are equally valid. As for landlord breach, I wasn't directing my entire comment to you Pixie, just considering the comments above re trespass etc.0 -
If LL won't compromise and you think he's going to enter your home without your permission, get some large sheets of paper and a black marker pen and write huge notes along the lines of.....
If you're viewing this property today, please be aware that the landlord has entered my home without permission.
Then stick one in every room.
Of course, if you need a reference, it may make it tricky. And don't use sellotape to stick it to the walls, he'll probably charge you for repainting the whole place"I may be many things but not being indiscreet isn't one of them"0 -
pmlindyloo wrote: »If it says 'the tenant will agree for the LL to enter the property at any time during the last 28 days to do viewings with or without the tenant's permission' then I would agree with you.
You wrote that I was undoubtedly wrong in my previous pst but now you agree with me?
Right... Welcome to MSE.
Your post simply showed that you did not really understand the topic, so please do not tell other whether they are right or wrong when you are not in a position to judge.0 -
Miss_Samantha wrote: »You wrote that I was undoubtedly wrong in my previous pst but now you agree with me?
Right... Welcome to MSE.
Your post simply showed that you did not really understand the topic, so please do not tell other whether they are right or wrong when you are not in a position to judge.
Dear me, what a hostile post.
I only said I would agree with you if the clause in the tenancy agreement said what I quoted.
In the absence of the OP telling us what his contract actually says then you are making the assumption.0 -
How on earth has the routine activity of showing prospective tenants around turned into a full-blown landlord/tenant dispute?
Surely it should go something like this :
LL : Sorry to hear that you are leaving, I'm planning to bring somebody round to have a look at the place on Wednesday.
Tenant : No problem, I'll be out on Wednesday but I'll try and leave it tidy.
Job done!0 -
How on earth has the routine activity of showing prospective tenants around turned into a full-blown landlord/tenant dispute?
Surely it should go something like this :
LL : Sorry to hear that you are leaving, I'm planning to bring somebody round to have a look at the place on Wednesday.
Tenant : No problem, I'll be out on Wednesday but I'll try and leave it tidy.
Job done!
Or to put a different spin on it, if you didn't trust your landlord with access to your home when he asked permission, understand that he could access it, albeit illegally, at any time as he holds the keys. Did someone lift your toaster without a trace lately that there is such mistrust in your LL?0 -
How on earth has the routine activity of showing prospective tenants around turned into a full-blown landlord/tenant dispute?
Surely it should go something like this :
LL : Sorry to hear that you are leaving, I'm planning to bring somebody round to have a look at the place on Wednesday.
Tenant : No problem, I'll be out on Wednesday but I'll try and leave it tidy.
Job done!
Tenant: Sorry that day is not convenient but any other day will be fine.
LL: OK , I'll get back to you with a date and time that is convenient.Not even wrong0 -
So, as always seem to be the case, the definitive answer is not forthcoming and it has turned into a slanging match between certain members.
Or is the tenant hiding something and does not want the LL rooting through drawers/reporting the tenant to the police for use of illegal substances.:DI am a LandLord,(under review) so there!:p0 -
To answer the OP. No, the LL cannot simply gain access to your home, against your wishes, because it says he can in the t/agreement. Obviously, he CAN do so with your express or implied permission but, as you have already advised him that the date proposed isn't agreeable, he clearly doesn't have that permission REGARDLESS OF ANY CLAUSE IN ANY AGREEMENT.
Of course, the LL may argue that you are breaching the terms of the tenancy agreement and seek to invoke the legal redress open to him, which is to serve you a S8 notice and/or seek to secure a court order granting him access.
As always, regardless of the above, a negotiated agreement between both parties would be the best solution and it is always wise to put everything in writing and keep copies.
Your local council may have a department who deal with issues such as harassment and/or illegal eviction.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards