PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Buying a tenanted house, rent arrears contract clause

The sellers solicitor has inserted the following clause into the contact:

The buyer shall pay to the receivers on completion date all arrears of rent that are payable by any occupier or tenant under any existing tenancy agreement.

Thoughts appreciated :)

Comments

  • ThePants999
    ThePants999 Posts: 1,748 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Intriguing. Doesn't make any sense to me - rent arrears are owed to the seller, and that doesn't change on completion. They'd be able to collect both from you and the tenant. Sounds like trying it on, though I'm not experienced in this area.
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    My thoughts are that you're in the process of buying a property where the tenant doesn't pay their rent.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Why on earth are you buyibf a property with a non-paying tenant in situ?

    Forget the clause.

    Forget the property! (unless the seller offers it with vacant possession).
  • bebewoo
    bebewoo Posts: 622 Forumite
    That's outrageous to try to make you personally liable for something that is completely outside of your control and not even the slightest bit your responsibility.
  • saajan_12
    saajan_12 Posts: 5,137 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Intriguing. Doesn't make any sense to me - rent arrears are owed to the seller, and that doesn't change on completion. They'd be able to collect both from you and the tenant. Sounds like trying it on, though I'm not experienced in this area.

    Surely if the buyer steps into the shoes as the LL under the existing tenancy agreement, then the tenant should pay any rent arrears to the current LL (ie. buyer) so in theory it does make sense the buyer pays the seller for any arrears (deposits are frequently handled similarly I believe).

    That's completely aside from the fact that buying a BTL is buying a business not just a property. You don't want one with a non paying customer. ONLY BUY IF THE PROPERTY IS SOLD VACANT!
  • ThePants999
    ThePants999 Posts: 1,748 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    saajan_12 wrote: »
    Surely if the buyer steps into the shoes as the LL under the existing tenancy agreement, then the tenant should pay any rent arrears to the current LL (ie. buyer) so in theory it does make sense the buyer pays the seller for any arrears (deposits are frequently handled similarly I believe).
    No. By default, any rent that covers the period where the seller owned the property is due to the seller. It would have gone to the seller if it was paid on time - being paid late doesn't change whose money it is. The tenant should, of course, start paying any NEW rent to the buyer - and ideally there ought to be some consideration for rent payments made in advance that partly cover the period after completion.
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    No. By default, any rent that covers the period where the seller owned the property is due to the seller. It would have gone to the seller if it was paid on time - being paid late doesn't change whose money it is. The tenant should, of course, start paying any NEW rent to the buyer - and ideally there ought to be some consideration for rent payments made in advance that partly cover the period after completion.

    I'm not convinced that's the case.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.