Indigo PN St. Albans Station

dirtdog

Sweet - that is great news.

Congratulations on beating them!

dirtdog

Indigo has now uploaded their evidence pack to POPLA.

It contains some photographs of my vehicle, some bad photos of signs and a copy of their contract with GTR.

POPLA has given me the option to comment on the evidence pack.

Is there any reason for me to do this?

Coupon-mad

Yes, everyone here does. POPLA are not legally trained so might need a final reminder and heads up as to the holes in the evidence.

Read other such threads who have been there, done that, and won. Try 'Indigo evidence rebuttal' or 'Indigo POPLA comments' and ''show posts'' to narrow your search down.

dirtdog

Thank you C-m.

I guess I was a bit surprised they didn't just fold.

Oh, well.

Coupon-mad

Yes, it's odd because they lose as POPLA, so they are wasting their time IMHO!

dirtdog

And money too, I suppose!

dirtdog

For the sake of anyone else using this thread to deal with Indigo I am posting the text I intend to use a comments with POPLA:

Any comments are much appreciated.

---

My comments on the Indigo evidence pack re POPLA code xxxxxxxxxx:

* Indigo have failed to show that the individual (me) that they are pursuing for this penalty charge is actually the party potentially liable under Railway Byelaws. Neither the driver nor the owner have been identified at any point.

* I appealed as the registered keeper and as such, I cannot be held liable under any applicable law or byelaw. My appeals covers this vital issue of 'no keeper liability' and Indigo have failed to show any evidence of the identity of the owner (the only party the byelaws say can be liable for a penalty).

* The case file continues to state that my breach was 'Parked without displaying valid payment'. It fails to counter my stand that this is not a valid breach under Rail Bye law 14 which regulates the terms and conditions of the car park. The pictures of my car in the evidence pack, in no way serve to counter my above argument as the only show failure to display a voucher - which I have argued is not an offence under Rail Byelaw 14.

* The pack fails to provide evidence of 'Landowner authority' which was the second ground of my appeal to POPLA.

This concludes my final comments on the evidence.

oaod

Sli88,

Please can you post your appeal here so I can use it?

Thank you!

waamo

oaod wrote: »

Sli88,

Please can you post your appeal here so I can use it?

Thank you!

I believe it was an adapted version of the one found here


http://http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=72195225&postcount=14

oaod

waamo wrote: »

I believe it was an adapted version of the one found here

Thank you. I have added the No breach of byelaw to my appeal