PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

My journey. Self employed and want a new final home. It's complicated.

13»

Comments

  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ACG wrote: »
    Im not disputing what Adrian says but i would double check...
    Companies and partnerships

    Companies have to pay the higher rates when they buy any residential properties that are over £40,000 and aren’t subject to a lease of more than 21 years.
    You’ll have to pay the higher rates if your partnership already owns a residential property and you purchase another residential property for your partnership.
    You won’t have to pay the higher rates if you buy a property for yourself and your only additional properties are used for your partnership’s trade.


    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/stamp-duty-land-tax-buying-an-additional-residential-property

    Personally I think it would be due, but in all honesty I do not know the answer.

    The OP's talking about a company, rather than a partnership. Different types of legal entity.
  • ACG
    ACG Posts: 24,641 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    I understand it is a different entity (I have my own ltd co), but the bit I have copied and pasted does seem to differentiate between sole traders and limited companies.

    This is not exactly relevant, but if the principle is the same then again it backs up that stamp duty could be due:
    Trusts

    You’ll be treated as owning a property if you receive all the income from it and the proceeds from its sale even if you’re not the legal owner.
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • ACG
    ACG Posts: 24,641 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Actually, I have found the answer I think, Adrian appears to be correct.
    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/570876/SDLT_Higher_rates_for_additional_properties.pdf
    Q26.
    I have share
    s in a limited company which owns a property for rental to tenants. I
    am purchasing another property which I will own direct. I do not own any other
    residential property. Will I have to pay the higher rates?
    A26.
    No, shareholdings in a company that owns residential property will not be counted
    when determining if an individual is purchasing an additional residential property,
    although the company may be liable to the higher rates if it purchases residential
    proper
    ty. As this is your first purchase of a residential property the higher rates will
    not apply.

    Still, just get your solicitor to give you the green light. That is what you are paying them for.
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • Prosperous1
    Prosperous1 Posts: 52 Forumite
    Credit reports ordered. That's the first step ticked..
  • Prosperous1
    Prosperous1 Posts: 52 Forumite
    Viewed both credit reports. Exoerian no surprises or skeletons in the closet.
    Equifax however shows a default from a pay day loan in 2013 passed to a debt collector. The OLD company is no longer trading so I need to contact the dcl. I've never had an assignment of debt and as far as I knew all debts were paid. Hopefully just a small obstacle to overcome.. that said. Any and all adverse drops off in Sep 2019.. wondering if I should wait til then and have even more deposit...
  • Mrs36
    Mrs36 Posts: 193 Forumite
    I would wait O/P, then you'd be in a stronger position with no adverse, bigger deposit and more years of accounts too. Win win all round at that point.
  • Leaning to this...
    Gives me time to offload one of the rentals too. Tbh 2 and a half years flies by in reality... and I'm not going to jump until we find a property that ticks all the boxes anyway...
  • Checked wifes file on noddle. Default from 2014 when we had identity theft. This is for EE for £1600. We had loads removed with vodafone orange and opthers and paydayloans that were fraudulently taken out. Need to try and find the action fraud paperwork to have this removed. Good job Im sorting it this far in advance would hate to finding this out at mortgage app stage..
  • p00hsticks
    p00hsticks Posts: 14,498 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    ACG wrote: »
    Im not disputing what Adrian says but i would double check...

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/stamp-duty-land-tax-buying-an-additional-residential-property

    Personally I think it would be due, but in all honesty I do not know the answer.

    The OP says that they'll be selling their main home to buy the new one. If they do this then regardless of how many existing BTLs they have or whether the BTL owned by the limited company counts or not, there should be no additional SDLT due, as there is an exemption for the case where you are replacing your main residence.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.