We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
There won't be a crash
Comments
-
chucknorris wrote: »No it isn't regardless, it is the whole sales pitch (which you have overlooked)!
The 200 people are not being ignored, they ignited the flame of the initial offers!
The sales pitch worked - it attracted 200 people. Rejecting the 200 people results in no net-gain to the developer. They will likely have found an alternative property by the time their next development is taking orders.
It would be foolish to not consider offers from the 200 people that the pitch attracted.0 -
The sales pitch worked - it attracted 200 people. Rejecting the 200 people results in no net-gain to the developer. They will likely have found an alternative property by the time their next development is taking orders.
It would be foolish to not consider offers from the 200 people that the pitch attracted.
You are misunderstanding the sales method, it is to encourage people to rush in and buy, if you allow subsequent bids, you take away the urgency of the buyers.
EDIT: Conrad has already explained what their system was, he is a mortgage consultant and has owned investment property, so he knows what he is talking about.
Look at this:
http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/property-news/firsttime-buyers-queue-overnight-for-launch-of-newbuild-flats-in-hounslow-priced-from-199k-50601.htmlChuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
chucknorris wrote: »You are misunderstanding the sales method, it is to encourage people to rush in and buy, if you allow subsequent bids, you take away the urgency of the buyers.
EDIT: Conrad has already explained what their system was, he is a mortgage consultant and has owned investment property, so he knows what he is talking about.
Look at this:
http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/property-news/firsttime-buyers-queue-overnight-for-launch-of-newbuild-flats-in-hounslow-priced-from-199k-50601.html
It's the same technique in the art market. The sales are made because there is more buyers than product. The moment there isn't, everyone says they'll think about it and nothing gets bought.Proudly voted remain. A global union of countries is the only way to commit global capital to the rule of law.0 -
-
The last two crashes were when mortgage repayments became unaffordable (>50% income for new buyers). If you look in this chart on nationwide data, the large falls come directly after affordability shrinks (thin line) and have sustained rises when repayments are most affordable (mid 90's).
How much does the BoE base rate have to rise (in response to Brexit related inflation) before we see ftb mortgage:income ratios above 50% again?0 -
-
With the amount of debt floating around the house market I think anything higher than 4% would be a tipping point.
That's highly unlikely though (I would never say never).
We are highly indebted both publically and privately.
We desperately need to deflate that debt, so it's mulch more likely for interest rates to stay very low for many years.
PErsonally I see the biggest risk as a loss of confidence as our economy seems to be running on that at the moment.0 -
That's highly unlikely though (I would never say never).
We are highly indebted both publically and privately.
We desperately need to deflate that debt, so it's mulch more likely for interest rates to stay very low for many years.
PErsonally I see the biggest risk as a loss of confidence as our economy seems to be running on that at the moment.
Biggest risk is Brexit, its economic self harm. We will have to become a low tax economy, slash and burn welfare state, increase national debt, increase gap between rich and poor to keep companies interested in dealing with more red tape residing here.
Currently we're not running on confidence but just a very well placed position (in Europe with pound). When that goes we strip our foundations out beneath us.
The crash will be mitigated through tears and debt though, so expect property owners to be relatively ok, for a while.Proudly voted remain. A global union of countries is the only way to commit global capital to the rule of law.0 -
The last two crashes were when mortgage repayments became unaffordable (>50% income for new buyers). If you look in this chart on nationwide data, the large falls come directly after affordability shrinks (thin line) and have sustained rises when repayments are most affordable (mid 90's).
How much does the BoE base rate have to rise (in response to Brexit related inflation) before we see ftb mortgage:income ratios above 50% again?
The flaw in that chart is that it defines affordability naively as house price divided by FTB income. You simply can't do this because this ignores interest rates. Which is more affordable, a house at 3x FTB income with 0.25% base rates or one at 2x FTB income with 15% base rates?
The issue now appears to be the size of deposit you'd need to save to afford to buy, and the limited multiple of salary you can borrow. It is not so very long, however, since crashtrolls here and elsewhere were ranting about 100% self-cert mortgages, and about how back in the good old days, it was 10% deposit, borrow 3.5x your salary and you could slap your wife about as you watched Love Thy Neighbour.
Well, the trolls have got what they wanted and now they've got it they find they don't like it. So we'll know not to ask them again.0 -
That's highly unlikely though (I would never say never).
We are highly indebted both publically and privately.
We desperately need to deflate that debt, so it's mulch more likely for interest rates to stay very low for many years.
PErsonally I see the biggest risk as a loss of confidence as our economy seems to be running on that at the moment.
If people haven't figured out by now that increasing interest rates would be economic suicide for Britain then they'll never understand. There won't be significant interest rate rises as everyone would suffer not just people with a mortgage.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards