Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

There won't be a crash

135678

Comments

  • Keezing
    Keezing Posts: 322 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    No it isn't regardless, it is the whole sales pitch (which you have overlooked)!

    The 200 people are not being ignored, they ignited the flame of the initial offers!

    The sales pitch worked - it attracted 200 people. Rejecting the 200 people results in no net-gain to the developer. They will likely have found an alternative property by the time their next development is taking orders.

    It would be foolish to not consider offers from the 200 people that the pitch attracted.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 19 March 2017 at 1:57PM
    Keezing wrote: »
    The sales pitch worked - it attracted 200 people. Rejecting the 200 people results in no net-gain to the developer. They will likely have found an alternative property by the time their next development is taking orders.

    It would be foolish to not consider offers from the 200 people that the pitch attracted.

    You are misunderstanding the sales method, it is to encourage people to rush in and buy, if you allow subsequent bids, you take away the urgency of the buyers.

    EDIT: Conrad has already explained what their system was, he is a mortgage consultant and has owned investment property, so he knows what he is talking about.

    Look at this:
    http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/property-news/firsttime-buyers-queue-overnight-for-launch-of-newbuild-flats-in-hounslow-priced-from-199k-50601.html
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • padington
    padington Posts: 3,121 Forumite
    You are misunderstanding the sales method, it is to encourage people to rush in and buy, if you allow subsequent bids, you take away the urgency of the buyers.

    EDIT: Conrad has already explained what their system was, he is a mortgage consultant and has owned investment property, so he knows what he is talking about.

    Look at this:
    http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/property-news/firsttime-buyers-queue-overnight-for-launch-of-newbuild-flats-in-hounslow-priced-from-199k-50601.html

    It's the same technique in the art market. The sales are made because there is more buyers than product. The moment there isn't, everyone says they'll think about it and nothing gets bought.
    Proudly voted remain. A global union of countries is the only way to commit global capital to the rule of law.
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 20 March 2017 at 10:16AM
    Keezing wrote: »
    Nice story.

    Obviously in reality everyone would be given the opportunity to bid and the price would be driven up.

    And this is indeed the process applied to another development we were due to see after this one, where sealed bids would apply.
  • novice_1
    novice_1 Posts: 11 Forumite
    The last two crashes were when mortgage repayments became unaffordable (>50% income for new buyers). If you look in this chart on nationwide data, the large falls come directly after affordability shrinks (thin line) and have sustained rises when repayments are most affordable (mid 90's).

    How much does the BoE base rate have to rise (in response to Brexit related inflation) before we see ftb mortgage:income ratios above 50% again?
  • norm_
    norm_ Posts: 191 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    novice_1 wrote: »

    How much does the BoE base rate have to rise (in response to Brexit related inflation) before we see ftb mortgage:income ratios above 50% again?

    With the amount of debt floating around the house market I think anything higher than 4% would be a tipping point.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,077 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    norm_ wrote: »
    With the amount of debt floating around the house market I think anything higher than 4% would be a tipping point.

    That's highly unlikely though (I would never say never).
    We are highly indebted both publically and privately.
    We desperately need to deflate that debt, so it's mulch more likely for interest rates to stay very low for many years.

    PErsonally I see the biggest risk as a loss of confidence as our economy seems to be running on that at the moment.
  • padington
    padington Posts: 3,121 Forumite
    edited 21 March 2017 at 8:20AM
    lisyloo wrote: »
    That's highly unlikely though (I would never say never).
    We are highly indebted both publically and privately.
    We desperately need to deflate that debt, so it's mulch more likely for interest rates to stay very low for many years.

    PErsonally I see the biggest risk as a loss of confidence as our economy seems to be running on that at the moment.

    Biggest risk is Brexit, its economic self harm. We will have to become a low tax economy, slash and burn welfare state, increase national debt, increase gap between rich and poor to keep companies interested in dealing with more red tape residing here.

    Currently we're not running on confidence but just a very well placed position (in Europe with pound). When that goes we strip our foundations out beneath us.

    The crash will be mitigated through tears and debt though, so expect property owners to be relatively ok, for a while.
    Proudly voted remain. A global union of countries is the only way to commit global capital to the rule of law.
  • novice_1 wrote: »
    The last two crashes were when mortgage repayments became unaffordable (>50% income for new buyers). If you look in this chart on nationwide data, the large falls come directly after affordability shrinks (thin line) and have sustained rises when repayments are most affordable (mid 90's).

    How much does the BoE base rate have to rise (in response to Brexit related inflation) before we see ftb mortgage:income ratios above 50% again?

    The flaw in that chart is that it defines affordability naively as house price divided by FTB income. You simply can't do this because this ignores interest rates. Which is more affordable, a house at 3x FTB income with 0.25% base rates or one at 2x FTB income with 15% base rates?

    The issue now appears to be the size of deposit you'd need to save to afford to buy, and the limited multiple of salary you can borrow. It is not so very long, however, since crashtrolls here and elsewhere were ranting about 100% self-cert mortgages, and about how back in the good old days, it was 10% deposit, borrow 3.5x your salary and you could slap your wife about as you watched Love Thy Neighbour.

    Well, the trolls have got what they wanted and now they've got it they find they don't like it. So we'll know not to ask them again.
  • lisyloo wrote: »
    That's highly unlikely though (I would never say never).
    We are highly indebted both publically and privately.
    We desperately need to deflate that debt, so it's mulch more likely for interest rates to stay very low for many years.

    PErsonally I see the biggest risk as a loss of confidence as our economy seems to be running on that at the moment.

    If people haven't figured out by now that increasing interest rates would be economic suicide for Britain then they'll never understand. There won't be significant interest rate rises as everyone would suffer not just people with a mortgage.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.