We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Getting plumber in to check boiler
Options

BishBashBosh86
Posts: 29 Forumite
Hi all,
First time buyer. Recently had an offer accepted on a house and I have just started the "next phase".
My solicitor has suggested that I get a plumber in to check the central heating system.
When we viewed the house our initial thoughts were the boiler looked old and would need replacing. Its a "Main Combi 24 HE" which doesnt mean a great deal to me but maybe someone here will know abit about it?
I've asked the estate agent about when the last service was and they sent over the form which stated it was checked last August and everything was fine. I believe the house has been empty for a couple of months now.
There is money in the budget to cover getting a new boiler but I'm torn as to whether to just stick with the one in the house and get it checked or to just get a new one now.
First time buyer. Recently had an offer accepted on a house and I have just started the "next phase".
My solicitor has suggested that I get a plumber in to check the central heating system.
When we viewed the house our initial thoughts were the boiler looked old and would need replacing. Its a "Main Combi 24 HE" which doesnt mean a great deal to me but maybe someone here will know abit about it?
I've asked the estate agent about when the last service was and they sent over the form which stated it was checked last August and everything was fine. I believe the house has been empty for a couple of months now.
There is money in the budget to cover getting a new boiler but I'm torn as to whether to just stick with the one in the house and get it checked or to just get a new one now.
0
Comments
-
Actually just found a "rating" of the boiler here - http://www.homeheatingguide.co.uk/efficiency-tables.php?model=010444
Doesn't sound too bad at all.0 -
Replacing a boiler might cost about £1500 to £2000, so you wouldn't normally do it just to get a more efficient boiler. (It might take many years for the savings on your gas bill to add up to the cost of the new boiler.)
If the boiler can't do what you want it to (e.g. provide enough hot water, heat up the house effectively), that might be a reason to change it - perhaps to a more powerful one.
Otherwise, the main reason to replace a boiler is when it becomes uneconomic to maintain and repair.
A heating engineer (as opposed to a plumber) could look at the system, to confirm that it works ok, and perhaps indicate what might need replacing soon and/or how much economic life is left in the boiler.0 -
BishBashBosh86 wrote: »Actually just found a "rating" of the boiler here - http://www.homeheatingguide.co.uk/efficiency-tables.php?model=010444
Doesn't sound too bad at all.
So the oldest it could possibly be is 12 years old! Hardly "needs" replacing (assuming it works).0 -
Agree entirely with the never replace a working boiler posts. A lot of buyers seem paranoid about boilers, but if parts are still available, it can be fixed if and when it breaks down."Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius0
-
'They don't make them like they used to'. New boilers appear to have a shorter life span than the older ones, so I'd leave it be until it breaks down beyond economic repair.
Ours was 34 years old when it was replaced, though the combi we now have is more convenient for just two people, as we only heat the water we need.0 -
BishBashBosh86 wrote: »....... our initial thoughts were the boiler looked old and would need replacing.........
There is money in the budget to cover getting a new boiler.....
Move in, see if it does what you need (heat & hot water). If it does, great, if it doesn't, you've got the money for a replcement.
Meantime, check it yourself on your next visit:
Do the radiators get hot? Does hot water come out of the taps? If you turn the thermostat down/up, does the boiler go off/on?
Not really rocket science.
You could even take a portable CO alarm and leave it by the boiler wile you measure up for curtains If it goes off, you know there's a problem, if it doesn't, well at least you know there's no CO risk!0 -
If the house feels like it is the house for you, worry about the boiler once you have secureed the propertyOwing on CC £00.00 :j
It's like shooting nerds in a barrel0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards