We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Rising Damp

2»

Comments

  • On one of the quotes there is mention of a suspected pipe leak affecting one wall.

    i have just seen the ability to pm you from this site but will not do it without your permission.
  • Hoploz
    Hoploz Posts: 3,888 Forumite
    I'd say it would be unusual or a building of this age to have what we would know as a 'damp proof course'
  • Lydia_Caldecot
    Lydia_Caldecot Posts: 8 Forumite
    edited 12 February 2017 at 6:00PM
    It was apparently put in in the '80s
  • Lydia_Caldecot
    Lydia_Caldecot Posts: 8 Forumite
    edited 12 February 2017 at 6:05PM
    Just seen your previous post Hoploz, thanks.

    The previous course was put in by the owner of the flat (who happened to be the freeholder) and according to a neighbour who was here from the start it expired rather than failed. Would that mean that we are liable for both interior and exterior walls or would the lease still stand?

    In the case of the roof we all paid to have it replaced but when it did leak the damage to the top flat was paid for by the insurance company, not by the sinking fund.
  • Hoploz
    Hoploz Posts: 3,888 Forumite
    This is all still confusing. The key will be to determine the cause of the damp.

    The steps, a pipe, or rising damp have all been suggested ... I think I would ask the buildings insurance co to send someone out and assess it properly to identify the actual cause.

    Basically, repairs internally will be down to individual flat owners either paying or contents insurance. Party walls and external walls would be paid for jointly under the service charge. But some of this is likely to be covered by the buildings insurance.
  • It is so confusing, your're spot on! but i have a much better idea now, thank you very much.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.