We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Halifax & FOS Rejected PPI Claim
Comments
-
Indeed, the OP needs to realise that the PPI complaint has been rejected and only the Plevin uncertainty is keeping the case from being closed.they seem to have ignored everything they have been told up to now and reverted to their original unprovable claim
I also sincerely doubt an actual Ombudsman would over turn the adjudicator decision, nor do I fancy the Op's chances in court.0 -
Moneyineptitude wrote: »Indeed, the OP needs to realise that the PPI complaint has been rejected and only the Plevin uncertainty is keeping the case from being closed.
I also sincerely doubt an actual Ombudsman would over turn the adjudicator decision, nor do I fancy the Op's chances in court.
Neither do I, it's just the OP was told back on the 8th that they either accept they were not miss-sold or go to the Ombudsman and posting here was pointless and yet they've come back reiterating the same points they were already told are irrelevant or unprovable...Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
To be fair, the latest post from the OP was prompted by a response from a FOS adjudicator. I agree he or she keeps repeating the same points and obviously doesn't want to accept the inevitable.just the OP was told back on the 8th that they either accept they were not miss-sold or go to the Ombudsman and posting here was pointless and yet they've come back reiterating the same points they were already told are irrelevant or unprovable...
I'm certain an Ombudsman referral is now in the works...0 -
Moneyineptitude wrote: »To be fair, the latest post from the OP was prompted by a response from a FOS adjudicator. I agree he or she keeps repeating the same points and obviously doesn't want to accept the inevitable.
I'm certain an Ombudsman referral is now in the works...
My reading of it is that the FOS wrote to the OP and rejected it because of the lack of proof and so on. OP then asked for a copy of the full file, which the FOS sent which said the same thing in more detail and OP has copied the accompanying letter on here.
The issue will be how long they keep posting on here instead of referring up to see if the Ombudsman agrees with their claimsSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
![[Deleted User]](https://us-noi.v-cdn.net/6031891/uploads/defaultavatar/nFA7H6UNOO0N5.jpg)
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards