We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
DSAR - Barclays Bank
Comments
-
-
societys_child wrote: »But it is irrelevant, even more so, as the post is almost two years old! I can see only one "rude" and "obnoxious" post on this thread . .
Yeah, side with the bullies, that's the way.
It is not 'irrelevant' to me because I am perfectly allowed to ask the poster a question so you are both completely and utterly wrong. Bullying does not wash with me, I'm afraid. Not in a million years.0 -
No "bullying" is apparent here.
For some reason, this thread was "bumped" from two years ago and (due to GDPR and the OP long since retiring from the forum) is no longer relevant.0 -
Moneyineptitude wrote: »No "bullying" is apparent here.
For some reason, this thread was "bumped" from two years ago and (due to GDPR and the OP long since retiring from the forum) is no longer relevant.
Come off it, you know exactly what I mean - the 'irrelevant to you'. People are allowed to ask OPs about the outcomes of their threads, are they not??0 -
Yeah, side with the bullies, that's the way.
It is not 'irrelevant' to me because I am perfectly allowed to ask the poster a question so you are both completely and utterly wrong. Bullying does not wash with me, I'm afraid. Not in a million years.
It is 100% irrelevant to you as your situation is nothing like this user, even if they were still active. When your account was opened/closed will be different for example, perhaps the OP was told there was nothing left because the account was closed 10 years ago, that doesn't mean you won't get any data, or the flip side, perhaps their account was still active and got data and yours was closed 6 years ago and they don't have anything left. The outcome of this DSAR has literally no impact at all on what you will get (or not). What were you planning on doing if they said there was no data left? Say some anonymous person on a forum got data and so they're lying to you? The format of the data he got (or didn't get) may well be different to yours, the accounts he had are different, the way they were opened was different.
In short, his situation is irrelevant to yours.
So as I said above, if you wish to submit a DSAR, then do it, it's now free. What happened with the OP is lost to the mists of time and would have had no impact at all on your case, why bump a 2 year dead thread to ask that?
Barclays allow you to do it online now, just fill in the form linked below
https://www.apply.barclays.co.uk/forms/gdpr?execution=e1s1
If you wish to deal with Barclays PPI, the link is below
https://www.barclays.co.uk/important-information/ppi/
Or if you need to speak to someone
024 7684 2100, open 24/7Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
It is 100% irrelevant to you as your situation is nothing like this user,
This is what you are having such a hard time understanding - my 'situation' is that I am interested. Period. I find it odd that you just cannot understand it. I can explain it to you but I cannot understand it for you.0 -
This is what you are having such a hard time understanding - my 'situation' is that I am interested. Period. I find it odd that you just cannot understand it. I can explain it to you but I cannot understand it for you.
And again, what the OP got (or didn't get) from Barclays has zero relevance to what you got.
Let's say OP replied and said he got a box of paper, what were you going to do with that information? How would that have any impact on your request from them?
Just send the DSAR, or don't, it's up to youSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
And again, what the OP got (or didn't get) from Barclays has zero relevance to what you got.
Oh my GOSH, you still don't get it, do you??
What on earth do you mean, 'what I got'? What thread are you looking at? I didn't 'get' anything? And from whom?
For some reason, you are not understanding me - I am an interested party, that's it.
You just cannot seem to fathom this??0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
