We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Does a broken Marriage have an expiry date?

Options
10 years ago, after being married for a number of years, a wife walks out of the family home. In all that time there has been no contact, of any sort, between the couple. Shortly after the wife left Divorce proceeding were initiated but never concluded.
What is the legal position of both parties?
Has the one who "walked" any entitlement to money or assets of the one who "remained"?
Can it be said that the marriage has expired after a specified number of years of estrangement?

Comments

  • TonyMMM
    TonyMMM Posts: 3,423 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Legally you are still married until the divorce is finalised (or one of you dies).

    Financial entitlement would depend on load of factors about who brought what to the marriage etc. Sounds like it would be a good idea to at least try and get things sorted out. Do you have any way of making contact ?
  • TBagpuss
    TBagpuss Posts: 11,236 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    No, marriages don't 'expire'. IF you want it ended you need a divorce.

    Who left who, or why, is normally irrelevant to the financial arrangements.

    Financially, the aim is to achieve a settlement fair to both parties, taking into account things such as each party's financial needs, their income and other resources, the length of the marriage etc. The assets which each party has now would need to be disclosed, and the court is entitled to consider, alongside the other factors, how long you have been separated and what financial assets you had at the time of the separation.

    For instance, if you stayed in the house and paid the mortgage then you have had the benefit of living there, in return for covering the cost of the mortgage, so it wouldn't automatically be fair for you to claim a higher share of the property. On the other hand, if you started a pension after she left, it would be much harder for her to claim a share of that.

    All of this goes both ways, it applies to her assets as well as to yours.
    All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.