We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Do I have to pay ?
Comments
-
You're over complicating this. The law is very straightforward.
Your freeholder has presented you with a demand for £700. If you ask them, they MUST show you receipts to prove that they have paid out this money.
So STEP 1 - ask to see those receipts.
If they refuse to show you, they are committing a criminal offence.
The fact that somebody else has bought the freehold is irrelevant. The new owners carry forward the rights and responsibilities of the old owners.
See below (from http://www.lease-advice.org.uk/documents/Service_Charges.pdf)Rights to further information (inspecting accounts and receipts) (Section 22 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985)
As well as receiving the summary, the leaseholder has the right to inspect documents relating to his service charge as a follow-up to provide more detail on the summary. Within a period of six months from receipt of the summary, the service charge payer (or the secretary of a recognised tenants’ association) may write to the landlord requiring him to allow access to and inspection of
the accounts, receipts and any other documents relevant to the service charge information in the summary and to provide facilities for them to be copied.
The above right applies even if the summary was provided via an end of year statement of account, rather than in response to a formal request for a summary under section 21.
Facilities for inspection must be provided within one month of the request, and must be available for a period of two months.Failure to provide a summary or allow access to further information
Where a landlord fails without reasonable excuse to comply with either a request for a summary or to inspect supporting documents they commit a summary offence on conviction and are liable
for a fine of up to £2,500 (level 4 on the standard scale of fines for summary offences). The local housing authority has the power to bring proceedings, or they can be brought by the leaseholder.
Local authorities are exempt from prosecution, but not Housing Associations.0 -
It sounds like the old freeholder just lumped all the money into one pot. From what you say I suspect that the £700 won't show as actually being for fire safety or anything else
As Eddddy says there should be accounts/ a summary whatever. And yes ask for proof of expenditure/receipts as a first step
Are you the sole leaseholder or are there are others in the block/house/whatever. If there are do you know what's happening with them?
It would appear that the new freeholder has taken over and found that the old freeholder let things slide - including not collecting service charges
Eddddy. Out of interest, as our managing agents do this for us so I am not always up to speed, what would happen if either part of the money was for a sinking fund (I assume that would be defined in the summary) or more likely in this case, that the money may have been spent but not on fire safety.0 -
Eddddy. Out of interest, as our managing agents do this for us so I am not always up to speed, what would happen if either part of the money was for a sinking fund (I assume that would be defined in the summary) or more likely in this case, that the money may have been spent but not on fire safety.
Taking a step back...
People seem to be thinking that freeholders can ask for almost any money they want, and spend it how they want. They cannot.
The lease is a legal document that states what a freeholder can spend money on.
If the lease says the freeholder can put money in a sinking fund, then they can.
But the freeholder must still account for every penny that goes into that fund. And additionally, the law states that the amount put into the sinking fund must be 'reasonable', and that any expenditure made from it must be 'reasonable'.
If a leaseholder thinks that anything that a freeholder does with the leaseholders' money is 'unreasonable', there are routes to challenge it at a Tribunal.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards