PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Landlord wants to evict me and move back in!

Options
1101113151649

Comments

  • Person_one
    Person_one Posts: 28,884 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Kalamazoo wrote: »
    Good to see all the bored voyeurs of MSE stoked the OP into sending a needlessly combative response.

    All they had to send after their initial response was to suggest the LL seek legal advice, and agree to communicate further only through those channels. Then change the locks to be sure.

    Still, at least they've provided entertainment for the usual suspects

    It worked though, the LL will now leave the OP in peace until the end of their tenancy.

    Hopefully he'll also be motivated to get his act together on the other stuff he needs to sort out too.
  • If the landlord had wanted to resolve it amicably he could have started by asking if he could have the house back early. He started by stating he was taking it back and quoting his rights, incorrectly. He has only been answered in kind.


    I agree, this was not started amicably.
    :eek:
  • greyfox
    greyfox Posts: 484 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    jamesb1983 wrote: »

    # LLResponse


    We feel that giving you a few months notice is fair ...We do require our home back and regardless will be serving notice for the summer.

    As I understand it, you agreed a 12 month AST from August 2016, which would end in Aug 2017. In my eyes, that is "the summer".

    Are you sure the LL is trying to get you out before your 12 month tenancy ends? He could simply be giving you lots of advance notice the he won't be renewing it this August. Might be worth checking before you go any further as I think that would be a whole different ball-game.
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    greyfox wrote: »
    As I understand it, you agreed a 12 month AST from August 2016, which would end in Aug 2017. In my eyes, that is "the summer".

    Are you sure the LL is trying to get you out before your 12 month tenancy ends? He could simply be giving you lots of advance notice the he won't be renewing it this August. Might be worth checking before you go any further as I think that would be a whole different ball-game.



    Yes, the initial contact was for the property back by April.
  • greyfox wrote: »
    As I understand it, you agreed a 12 month AST from August 2016, which would end in Aug 2017. In my eyes, that is "the summer".

    Are you sure the LL is trying to get you out before your 12 month tenancy ends? He could simply be giving you lots of advance notice the he won't be renewing it this August. Might be worth checking before you go any further as I think that would be a whole different ball-game.

    please look at post 14 ;)
    :eek:
  • Guest101 wrote: »
    Dear LL,

    I don't know who this agent is, they're nothing to do with me and I don't pay rent to them. I will seek independent advice from HMRC.

    ...
    Kind regards


    James

    I would add something to the effect that it might more quickly resolve the issue (of tax, not surrendering the property) if they supplied the relevant documentation, which presumably either they or their former agent have on file somewhere.
  • greyfox
    greyfox Posts: 484 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    Sorry, had missed that! That'll teach me not to skim read.
  • MissMoneypenny
    MissMoneypenny Posts: 5,324 Forumite
    edited 19 January 2017 at 12:49PM
    I would add something to the effect that it might more quickly resolve the issue (of tax, not surrendering the property) if they supplied the relevant documentation, which presumably either they or their former agent have on file somewhere.

    For tenants, on the goverment website and in post 121 with the link. My bold.

    You don’t need to deduct the tax if HMRC has told you in writing that the landlord can receive the rent with no tax deducted, but you must still register with HMRC and complete an annual report.




    RENTING? Have you checked to see that your landlord has permission from their mortgage lender to rent the property? If not, you could be thrown out with very little notice.
    Read the sticky on the House Buying, Renting & Selling board.


  • For tenants, on the goverment website and in post 121. My bold.

    You don’t need to deduct the tax if HMRC has told you in writing that the landlord can receive the rent with no tax deducted, but you must still register with HMRC and complete an annual report.

    Ok, thanks for the correction.
  • It's all out there on the government's site.

    Indeed it tells you what to do. It's quite clear that if you are paying rent direct to a landlord who is not resident in the UK you must register with HMRC who will instruct you appropriately.

    What is less clear is what happens to a tenant who doesn't realise this is a requirement? For most transactions your average person takes part in they don't have to deal with withholding money and paying to HMRC (their employer withholds income tax, the shop pays the VAT etc). So there's no reason you'd expect it to be any different for renting. I'd expect say 99% of renters would be surprised to learn about this requirement. Unless you specifically go searching for information you could be acting in good faith and totally unaware.

    As such it would seem unfair of HMRC to chase such a tenant for the missing tax. Would be interesting to know a) if the are able to do so and b) if they ever would.

    Of course another situation where the tenant is aware of this and specifically decides not to (maybe the landlord said don't register and I'll knock some money off the rent) chasing them for the tax seems justified.

    Really it seems the landlord should have a responsibility to notify the tenant they'll need to register for HMRC (so you can justify chasing the tenant as they had been told and chose not to), but that doesn't seem to be the case.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.