PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Rent rise!

Options
2

Comments

  • boyse7en wrote: »
    What committee?

    Is this just for rents set by the council, or are you saying that private landlords can be forced into renting out their property for whatever the rent assessor deems reasonable?

    No.......... anyone who is subject to a current Tenancy Agreement and is faced with an unfair or disproportionate rent increase can apply to their local Rent Assessment Committee for a legal ruling (after trying to negotiate with their LL or tenant) the decision is based on local market rents, property size and condition and any other dispute or relevant factors.
  • RabbitMad
    RabbitMad Posts: 2,069 Forumite
    I disagree with Coal. While I might be wrong these links implies that I am correct

    http://www.thesite.org/homelawandmoney/askthesiteqandas/housingqandas/increasingcosts
    http://www.therentservice.gov.uk/advice-guidance/fair-rent.asp

    Coal - do you have a link that backs up your claim that rent assesment applies to AST's? I'm happy to be proved wrong.
  • Innys
    Innys Posts: 1,881 Forumite
    coal9011 wrote: »
    No.......... anyone who is subject to a current Tenancy Agreement and is faced with an unfair or disproportionate rent increase can apply to their local Rent Assessment Committee for a legal ruling (after trying to negotiate with their LL or tenant) the decision is based on local market rents, property size and condition and any other dispute or relevant factors.

    In practice, how binding is this?

    If a tenant is on a contract with a one month notice period, if they felt the assessment was incorrect, couldn't they just hand in their notice and leave the property one month later? Obviously, it's not quite as easy for a landlord to do the same...
  • RabbitMad wrote: »
    I disagree with Coal. While I might be wrong these links implies that I am correct

    http://www.thesite.org/homelawandmoney/askthesiteqandas/housingqandas/increasingcosts
    http://www.therentservice.gov.uk/advice-guidance/fair-rent.asp

    Coal - do you have a link that backs up your claim that rent assesment applies to AST's? I'm happy to be proved wrong.

    Sorry, I am only talking from experience. I don't know about Scotland, but what I have said does apply to England and Wales and is correct.

    It is covered by the Housing Act 1988, Section 13(2) as amended by the Regulatory Reform Order (Assured Periodic Tenancies) 2003. It appears to me be be a "little known" and "little used" peice of legislation by tenants facing what they deem as a disproprotionate increase of rent.

    (a)What happens is the tenant disagrees with an increase of rent.

    (b)The landlord issues a "Landlords Notice Proposing a New Rent Under an Assured Periodic Tenancy Premises Situated in England" (section 13(2) ) form.

    (c)The tenant then applies to the government's Residential Property Tribunal Service (local Rent Assessment Panel (committee) ) to assess a fair rent.

    (d)Various "written representions" take place between the Tenant - Committee, Landlord - Committee, Committee and both parties.

    (e)Then a property "site visit" by the Committee takes place.

    (f)Then there is a hearing when all can attend, or it's just dealt with by written representations.

    (g)The Committee gives a decision about the rent - which is "legally binding".

    (h)The Rent Assessment Panel issue notice of their decision to both parties and back-date the increase/reduction in rent to the beginning of the process.

    In my case this all took just under 3 months from start to finish. My LL wanted to increase my rent by £20 per week and the committee allowed an increase of £10 per week.

    From some of the replies on this forum, it appears that few people actually know about the Residential Property Tribunal Service.

    It's a good way to resolve rent disputes - but I suspect many tenants can't be bothered to use it! - they should!!!!!! ;)
  • RabbitMad
    RabbitMad Posts: 2,069 Forumite
    So it only applies to non Assured Shorthold Tenancies (or Assured Tenancies even) which I would hazzard a guess are the minority of tenancies out there as most are now ASTs.

    http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/residential_tenancies.htm
  • coal9011 wrote: »
    Sorry, I am only talking from experience. I don't know about Scotland, but what I have said does apply to England and Wales and is correct.

    It is covered by the Housing Act 1988, Section 13(2) as amended by the Regulatory Reform Order (Assured Periodic Tenancies) 2003. It appears to me be be a "little known" and "little used" peice of legislation by tenants facing what they deem as a disproprotionate increase of rent.

    (a)What happens is the tenant disagrees with an increase of rent.

    (b)The landlord issues a "Landlords Notice Proposing a New Rent Under an Assured Periodic Tenancy Premises Situated in England" (section 13(2) ) form.

    (c)The tenant then applies to the government's Residential Property Tribunal Service (local Rent Assessment Panel (committee) ) to assess a fair rent.

    (d)Various "written representions" take place between the Tenant - Committee, Landlord - Committee, Committee and both parties.

    (e)Then a property "site visit" by the Committee takes place.

    (f)Then there is a hearing when all can attend, or it's just dealt with by written representations.

    (g)The Committee gives a decision about the rent - which is "legally binding".

    (h)The Rent Assessment Panel issue notice of their decision to both parties and back-date the increase/reduction in rent to the beginning of the process.

    In my case this all took just under 3 months from start to finish. My LL wanted to increase my rent by £20 per week and the committee allowed an increase of £10 per week.

    From some of the replies on this forum, it appears that few people actually know about the Residential Property Tribunal Service.

    It's a good way to resolve rent disputes - but I suspect many tenants can't be bothered to use it! - they should!!!!!! ;)

    It's only useful to those on Assured non-periodic tenancies and not ASTs - it's little used because so few tenants have such tenancies because they haven't been made available for A VERY LONG time...
  • Your most probably right "barnaby-bear"......... as mine is a quite unusual tenancy agreement , even although it is titled: "Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement".

    The Rent Assessment Panel looked at it concluded that "the agreement had actually created an Assured Periodic Tenancy, under which the landlord could properly serve a "Notice of Increase" under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988"

    I contested this notice, the Rent Assessment committee excepted my arguements and allowed a £10 per week increase in rent, not £20 as the LL wanted.
  • Coal, your a star, you have at least given me hope! Today Is a local holiday but I will phone the council tomorrow and find out if I qualify. At the very least they should be able to tell me if there is anything that I can do or who to contact.
    Thanks a million:)
    funschine
    Happy to be happy
  • Thanks also bear:) you guys are great:)
    Happy to be happy
  • coal9011 wrote: »
    Your most probably right "barnaby-bear"......... as mine is a quite unusual tenancy agreement , even although it is titled: "Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement".

    The Rent Assessment Panel looked at it concluded that "the agreement had actually created an Assured Periodic Tenancy, under which the landlord could properly serve a "Notice of Increase" under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988"

    I contested this notice, the Rent Assessment committee excepted my arguements and allowed a £10 per week increase in rent, not £20 as the LL wanted.

    Actually "I" was right! :rolleyes: ............ If you look again at the quote from the Rent Assessment Panel they concluded that my agreement WAS an "Assured Periodic Tenancy" and as such they could make a ruling about rent.

    So it's not just useful for NON Periodic Tenancy Agreements, but other types of ageement as well.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.