PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Landlords buildings cover - fire damage

Options
Property i own and rent out suffered a washing machine fire earlier, thankfully tennants ok.

The wooden flooring has been damaged badly though and the whole house suffered smoke damage. I have landlords building cover on the property. Just wondering what extent of things it will generally cover??
I dont have access to my policy booklet tonight so wondered if anyone had any idea

Flooring? re-decorating? Carpets? Etc

Thankyou for any input

Comments

  • dimbo61
    dimbo61 Posts: 13,727 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    That all depends on how good the policy is and what is covers.
    Did you have an electrical inspection and certificate done before renting.
    Who owns the washing machine ? PAT tested at any time ?
  • JDi
    JDi Posts: 40 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Policy is with AXA so fairly decent.

    No electrical inspection officially but wiring is sound (im an electrician and had previously gone through all the wiring). Machine is tennant property and wasn't PAT tested (nobody does this in a house). Apparently the machine is a brand with known faults according to the fire officer and the report will state this to be the cause of the fire.

    Regards
  • csgohan4
    csgohan4 Posts: 10,600 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    indesit, whirlpool, hotpoint???


    Can you not claim from the tenant since it's their machine that caused it?


    Your tenants got what they paid for a washing machine.
    "It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"

    G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP
  • marliepanda
    marliepanda Posts: 7,186 Forumite
    I'm glad David Tennant was unhurt in this incident. What a loss he would be.

    However, he needs to claim off the washing machine company for the damage to his floor.
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    csgohan4 wrote: »
    Can you not claim from the tenant since it's their machine that caused it?

    On what basis would they be liable? There's no negligence (that we know of).
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    If it's a known fault, and the manufacturer has accepted the fault, or a court has determined the fault exists, then yes, you (or better, your insurers) could claim off the manufacturers.

    But 'known fault' could simply mean that Twitter or suchlike has identified a trend and Joe Public is claiming a manufacturing fault. That's very different as the M would likely deny responsibilty, leading to a potentially very long, and complex, legal case.

    Most decent insurance policies would cover fire, and that would include making good any consequential damage.
  • If there are real known faults then the tenant himself may have been negligent.

    Anyway, it is probably easier to claim off the building insurance and let the insurer go after whoever they think is responsible, if anyone.
    You could try to claim you excess from the tenant if you have good evidence to support any negligence.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.