📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

30 Day Survivorship clause - needed?

2»

Comments

  • Sea_Shell
    Sea_Shell Posts: 10,034 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Better spend it all soon then!! Leave nowt for anyone to worry about!:beer:
    How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)
  • MichelleUK wrote: »
    Sort of.....this is another area than is often misunderstood on this forum.


    A home held as tenants in common is part of the estate for IHT purposes and passes as per the deceaseds instructions in the will.

    Surely only the proportion held by the deceased is taken into account for IHT ? The other share does not belong to their estate.
  • Surely only the proportion held by the deceased is taken into account for IHT ? The other share does not belong to their estate.

    Yes, of course it is only the deceased's share - even HMRC would not be that unjust! That snippet was part of an answer to a specific scenario and was not meant to be used on it's own, out of context.
  • We are interested in this topic we are both in our 80s and are wondering whether we should keep The survivorship clause in our will or remove it

    If we were to die within 30 days of each other our understanding is that administering the estate would be simpler and more cost-effective if this clause is in place

    The main reason for not keeping the clause Would be is it impacted on any IHT due. My assets currently stand at 329k and my wife's 127k so I don't think IHT due for either after admin and funeral costs.

    Am I correct ?
  • TBagpuss
    TBagpuss Posts: 11,237 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    We are interested in this topic we are both in our 80s and are wondering whether we should keep The survivorship clause in our will or remove it

    If we were to die within 30 days of each other our understanding is that administering the estate would be simpler and more cost-effective if this clause is in place

    The main reason for not keeping the clause Would be is it impacted on any IHT due. My assets currently stand at 329k and my wife's 127k so I don't think IHT due for either after admin and funeral costs.

    Am I correct ?

    Well, it depends on eactly what your assets are worth on death and how much your funeral costs, but on the face of it, any IHT would be minimal on the figures you are talking about. However, the best bet would be to review your wills with a solicitor, and discuss the options.
    All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.