Advice re interest to be paid after 1 year by Executor

I believe I am correct in saying that after 1 year 'post death' (???), the Executor/Administrator is obliged to pay interest on the monies they hold on behalf of the beneficiaries to them?

Is anyone able to clarify this? Many thanks.
«1

Comments

  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 20,140 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 8 January 2017 at 11:33AM
    Depends on the circumstances, if the executor is a professional and it's a cash legacy then yes, although the interest rate will be tiny

    Edit. There is a statutory intest rate payable to pecuniary legacies (e.g. £5000 to uncle Fred) which I believe is currently less than 1%. If you are a residual beneficiary that does not apply, as in theory your final payout will include interest and dividends earned on any cash or investments held within the estate, from time of death to final winding up.
  • Anthear
    Anthear Posts: 209 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thanks for the comment, yes the Executors are professionals - so in this case, the interest is payable one year from the DOD?
  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 20,140 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Anthear wrote: »
    Thanks for the comment, yes the Executors are professionals - so in this case, the interest is payable one year from the DOD?

    Not if you are a residual beneficiary, but anyone who has been left a specific some of money is.

    It took my wife's uncle's solicitor nearly 3 years to wind his estate up. She was the sole residual beneficiary so no interest was paid, they did however pay all the pecuniary legacies well within the 12 months so all in al they paid no interest.
  • Not if you are a residual beneficiary, but anyone who has been left a specific some of money is.

    It took my wife's uncle's solicitor nearly 3 years to wind his estate up. She was the sole residual beneficiary so no interest was paid, they did however pay all the pecuniary legacies well within the 12 months so all in al they paid no interest.
    Unless there were very god reasons for the delay the residuary beneficiary should have been paid interest by way of compensation.
  • Anthear
    Anthear Posts: 209 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    That's interesting. DOD was in October 2014. No interest paid for 2015/16, but it HAS been paid in 2016/17 tax year, so not sure what's going on there. Nothing was paid out to the beneficiaries in the first 12 months. Taken until now to get to the end. Not happy.
  • Anthear wrote: »
    That's interesting. DOD was in October 2014. No interest paid for 2015/16, but it HAS been paid in 2016/17 tax year, so not sure what's going on there. Nothing was paid out to the beneficiaries in the first 12 months. Taken until now to get to the end. Not happy.
    The beneficiaries have a good case against the executor. In the first instance make a formal complaint to the solicitor under their complaints procedure. Interest at High Court rate is 8%.
  • securityguy
    securityguy Posts: 2,464 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 9 January 2017 at 12:12AM
    "The beneficiaries have a good case against the executor."

    Well, they might. It depends on the size of the legacy, the liquidity of the estate and the complexity of the situation. If you've been left a million quid by Mad Uncle Hamish, payable by an illiquid estate whose main assets are a Grade I listed building in a National Park and some land containing a scheduled ancient monument, an SSSI and what the county archaeologist now suspects to be a previously unknown Capability Brown landscape, then you have no case at all: you're going to have to wait for it to be wound up, which is not going to be quick. On the other hand, if it's a five grand legacy from Prudent Uncle Hamish who had a million quid on deposit with Nat West, then it's outrageous and you should be paid immediately with interest.
  • It is all very well to phantasise but the reality is that the professional executor should have kept the beneficiaries informed. Unless there are very unusual circumstances then the solicitors are at fault in a big way. Quite why the beneficiaries should have tolerated things for so long needs to be explained.
  • securityguy
    securityguy Posts: 2,464 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    "the professional executor should have kept the beneficiaries informed"

    I agree. That's a long way from "a good case against the executor", though. It's "hey, could you tell us what's going on? Thanks."
  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 20,140 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Have a read of the "time limits" section of this document.

    https://www.stoneking.co.uk/literature/info-sheets/probate-guide
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.