We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Question about lease conditions

13»

Comments

  • Hoploz
    Hoploz Posts: 3,888 Forumite
    I think she needs to ask her solicitor to find out for sure a couple of things -

    Who owns the freehold? (a remote company who are never going to be interested) or a collective of directors who are other residents (would she have the opportunity to join the board and also have a say)

    Whether the garden and wall are under her sole lease or considered to be communal.
  • NeilCr
    NeilCr Posts: 4,430 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    stardust09 wrote: »
    Thanks, Neil, you've been really helpful. Is it usual for Directors to be living on the development? Or when you say 'knocking on my door' are you being metaphorical?!

    It sounds like as long as my sister's upstairs neighbours aren't bothered about any washing line then there might not be any issues anyway? They are the only ones who might know it's there. Is there any way that written permission can be used to override this condition of the lease at the time or purchase or is it set in stone.

    Also, does the Lessor every really enter a property to inspect it as a routine matter (as specified in the lease) or do they usually leave the tenant to live there uninterupted unless there is a cause for concern?

    Leasehold is a minefield!

    As Adrian says in the situation we are in (company owned by residents) yes. The majority of our directors do - a couple are landlords and live away.

    Yep. They knock on your door. However much you direct them towards the management company the fact that they see you around means that they see you as fair game. Some even think we are paid!. It's not much of an issue here to be honest. The estate is in good nick and the management company, while very slow, do get things done in the end!

    I am not legally minded but, I think(!), we'd need everyone on the estate to agree for a covenant to be removed. It's worth remembering that people see things in different ways. Some folks buy a property (to an extent) because of the covenants. They don't want to be surrounded by commercial vehicles, Sky dishes, washing everywhere etc and get upset if they aren't followed.

    The washing lines are a good example. An earlier poster couldn't see a problem. I'm not bothered as long as they aren't hugely intrusive, my resident hated them. It's not always logical!

    I don't think you could get written permission to override a covenant. Personally, I'd be highly surprised if your sister had any problems from what you have said. Like others I'm vaguely bemused by the hosepipe one. The vast majority of our residents aren't that bothered by things unless they affect them. The biggest issue we have from residents is parking

    One of our covenants is that the inside of all our properties have to be redecorated every five years. There is no way I, or any of the other directors, am going to knock on doors to check this.

    I'm sure your sister will be fine. I do think covenants come as a huge surprise if you haven't encountered them before. I know I was rather taken aback!
  • Hoploz wrote: »
    I think she needs to ask her solicitor to find out for sure a couple of things -

    Who owns the freehold? (a remote company who are never going to be interested) or a collective of directors who are other residents (would she have the opportunity to join the board and also have a say)

    Whether the garden and wall are under her sole lease or considered to be communal.

    The garden is definitely under her sole lease (it's marked as part of the demised premises on the plan). The walls are backing onto neighbouring gardens which are not part of the development.

    The management company is one that was set up for that particular development of 12 flats and has a local address. The Landlord is listed as the Development Company (also local) and the Management company is listed as a tenant, along with the current owner.

    The solicitor will have to clarify if she can paint the garden wall. The lease says that she must keep the garden tidy, well tended and free of rubbish, so potentially covers this as long as it's allowed.

    Thank you to everyone for your incredibly helpful replies. I really appreciate it.

    :T
  • bouicca21
    bouicca21 Posts: 6,720 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My neighbour doesn't use a washing line - just hangs it out on an airer which goes back inside as soon as the washing is dry. I doubt many people even see what is happening and they certainly don't complain. They are more vociferous (behind his back) about the noisy dog and obstructive parking.
  • Marvel1
    Marvel1 Posts: 7,461 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If there are any lease conditions I wouldn't bother and would look for treetops instead.
  • stardust09
    stardust09 Posts: 264 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    cjdavies wrote: »
    If there are any lease conditions I wouldn't bother and would look for treetops instead.

    I think getting planning permission for a treehouse would be far more complex than a lease! That's a bit of a dead wood answer.

    :rotfl:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.