Inform DWP he's on the sex offenders registry?

seven-day-weekend

Whatever the OP's son has done, which we don't know, it is not the OP's fault and no need to be nasty to them.

(I'm sorry OP, I don't know the answer to your question).

Glen_Clark

missapril75 wrote: »

I'm assuming there have been some deletions? There's nothing like that until well after this comment and I just reported that one - from Dullville.

Yes, I was responding to some nasty, unhelpful and irrelevant comments which have since been deleted.

Tommo1980

Nice to see the mods were on it :-)

Tom

Bogalot

Anyone getting memories of BlueEyedGirl?

It's all sounding very familiar, especially the contradictions!

(And yes, you've been reported again.)

Mupette

I used to work in an approved premises and all our residents were on benefits.

They will have to inform their probation officer what they plan to do aka benefits, the probation officer is there to help and advise what they can claim, DWP tend to know what is going on, they don't need to know the nitty gritty of why they are there, but will have an idea, if they are put on JSA they will need to know what they can and can't send the person to.

Bogalot

Ricardo_Rolls wrote: »

I don't see an issue with expressing an opinion, if you don't like it jog along.

And what is your other banned AE then, care to divulge?

Is there a support worker you can call? You've had several reincarnations on here and each time they result in a pretty catastrophic meltdown. Is there someone you can contact for help before you get to that point?

PersianCatLady

patman99 wrote: »

My B-in-L is on the SOR. He is/was (now in jail for an unrelated crime) claiming JSA.
Like the op's son, he was not allowed access to any computer that did not hav Net Nanny installed on it by the Police.

He had to inform the jobcentre about being on the SOR and they made notes on their system to make sure that he was not tobe reccommended for certain jobs, or to be sanctioned for failure to obtain employment as he had a major disadvantage.

The Jobcentre also had to supervise him on a 1-2-1 basis when he was using their computers for job-hunting as he could access other sites (such as 'indeed') when using the computer.

To me it sounds fair that the person on the SOR is not penalised by the JCP just because they are restricted in what they can do.


I would also hope that once a person has declared this information to JCP staff that it is treated discretely and the person is assisted in any way that enables them to gain employment without breaching their restrictions.