Faulty mobile - 6 months old - can I insist on replacement?

neilmcl

DoaM wrote: »

As above, No.

As you can see the OP has already had this answered. There's no need to be, how did you put it, "unnecessarily critical".

Bit different when the shoe's on the other foot eh.

Apologies to the OP for this btw, just making a point for DoaM from another thread.

DoaM

At least I provided additional information as well as supporting the person who posted. An entirely different scenario to that other thread - there was no criticism made here at all. So the shoe is where it was originally - it hasn't changed feet. So your point was non-existent.

But if you want to be like this, have at it - I won't be responding.