PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Who owns property left in sold house?

Options
We've all seen those TVs programmes where someone finds s Stradivarius or a Rembrandt in their attic left behind by the previous owners and gets mega bucks when they sell them*.

So, having seen an episode of Flog It tonight where someone got a few hundred quid for a bit of tat that they found in their cellar after buying a house, I wondered what the legal position is.

Could the owner claim the money? Is there a time limit after which it becomes the buyers property ?


* unless it was a painting by Stradivarius and a violin by Rembrandt :rotfl: Apologies to Mr T Cooper.

Comments

  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Unless it's part of the fixtures and fittings, it's not the buyers.

    Simple question - is there a difference in ownership whether it's a skipful of rubbish left, or a valuable painting? Would you demand the vendor removed the rubbish?

    If you make the vendor aware that they've left goods behind, and give them a reasonable deadline to collect, then you can safely say that it's yours if ever they launch a claim against you.
  • csgohan4
    csgohan4 Posts: 10,600 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    You could perhaps charge the previous owner expenses for removal of said items, albeit to the auction house or to your local recycling centre.
    "It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"

    G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 16 December 2016 at 8:53PM
    AdrianC wrote: »
    ...

    If you make the vendor aware that they've left goods behind, and give them a reasonable deadline to collect, then you can safely say that it's yours if ever they launch a claim against you.
    You sure? I think you could sell the item, and use (some of) the money to cover your costs of storage, transport, sale etc, but any profit remaining would still belong to the original owners.

    Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 (S12)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.