We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
The Forum is currently experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Parents spent my inheritance...
Comments
-
Understandable why the Elderly Generation might think the next generation (ie the 50s/60s) are well "sorted" financially. They watch all the "boomer bashing" going on and see those "boomers" that are okay financially/all "sorted" doing travelling/treats/etc.
But - there are a heck of a lot in that generation that still aren't financially straight yet (many with debts and/or mortgages even). Anyone in that generation that is still working can virtually count on never getting a job again if they get made redundant. That generation are the ones that are often being "carers" for the Elderly Generation - lots of unpaid work freely given to them.
The friend of mine that has just been "bypassed" by her own mother in favour of her children is far from straight - still has a mortgage/still needs work doing on their house/their job prospects aren't good to say the least and she has spent many years being a "carer" to her Elderly Generation mother.
Yet that particular Gran wants the grandchildren (those professionals) to get the lion's share of the inheritance - carefully ignoring her own daughter's plight and many years of having been a "carer" for her.0 -
I have to say I work hard , very hard and I have been very lucky but who would not want to pay their mortgage off.??? I would love to be able to and often read the threads about it wishing I had the determination.
I don't have a lot but what I have |I have got myself.
That said if my parents needed anything I would rather carry on working and make sure that they where happy and could enjoy their retirement than struggle. I would rather they blow the lot and leave nothing.
I think it is a real shame how a big chunk of money can split families like this. OP I really hope that you can sort it out.
Money is important but not everything.Happiness, Health and Wealth in that order please!:A0 -
And we don't know if OP's parents were also beneficiaries of the will, they may well have been, even if all the proceeds from the sale of the property were divided between the grandchildren.
Executors and trustees must do their job properly, regardless of what they think about the contents of the will.0 -
Gran can leave her money to whoever she flippin' pleases. Gran did nothing wrong at all. As soon as you start to suggest she did, you're tacitly giving the parents permission to view the money as "rightfully" theirs.
Remember this case - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-33684937
in view of this legislation - http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1975/63
You are right in the most part, but you cannot just leave all your money to "the cat" and nothing for your dependents, if they are in need of it.0 -
Remember this case - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-33684937
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/dec/12/charities-in-supreme-court-battle-to-preserve-womans-inheritance
Mother and daughter fell out in 1978, when daughter aged 17, and never reconciled.
Mother died in 2004, left £486k to RSPB, Blue Cross, RSPCA, £0 to daughter.
Daughter awarded £50k in 2007.
Charities appealed, award revoked.
Daughter appealed, awarded £164k in 2015.
Charities appealing again now.
On the surface, it looks like the only winners are the solicitors - and I can foresee a Jarndyce-style pyrrhic victory for whichever side wins - but for the charities there's much more at stake, because this is going to be a major precedent.
I hope sense prevails and the charities win.0 -
In reality is is nothing short of theft, and you have every right to have your inheritance without further delay.
The parents have failed in there fiduciary duties, in using funds for anyone's benefit other than the beneficiaries of the will, and they now sit in a very precarious position.
If the will confirms what you currently believe then you have to leave them in no doubt that unless they can raise the funds to paid you what you are owed, including compensation for not having access to what was rightfully ours from the age of 18, then you will have no choice but to take legal action to recover your losses which could end up with a forced house sale.
The ideal result would be for the parents to hold their hands up, and pay out to the two siblings who have yet to receive their share. If they don't have the liquid assets then equity release might be the way to go.0 -
Remember it? It's in the Supreme Court at the moment...
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/dec/12/charities-in-supreme-court-battle-to-preserve-womans-inheritance
Mother and daughter fell out in 1978, when daughter aged 17, and never reconciled.
Mother died in 2004, left £486k to RSPB, Blue Cross, RSPCA, £0 to daughter.
Daughter awarded £50k in 2007.
Charities appealed, award revoked.
Daughter appealed, awarded £164k in 2015.
Charities appealing again now.
On the surface, it looks like the only winners are the daughters - and I can foresee a Jarndyce-style pyrrhic victory for whichever side wins - but for the charities there's much more at stake, because this is going to be a major precedent.
I hope sense prevails and the charities win.
This cases will not set a precedent, because similar cases have happened in the past and each is assessed on its merits. The mother in this case appears to be a very vindictive person who never forgave her daughter for going against her at 17 and the ongoing lack of parental support is likely to have contributed to her current state, so I can see why she has been awarded part of the estate.0 -
Keep_pedalling wrote: »...and the ongoing lack of parental support is likely to have contributed to her current state...0
-
Mixing trust money into their own assets, might give their executors a bit of a nightmare when it comes down to valuing an estate, and handling any tax issues that might fall out of that.
I think that the parents should get some legal advice themselves, on how to extract themselves from this mess.0 -
extradite
Extract?
Unless you're thinking of handing themselves over to a foreign state:eek::eek:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.7K Life & Family
- 256.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards