NWCP Car Parks PCN - Over 28 days

manutd99

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Yes they probably would tell you, and the DJ's name can be useful when quoting a decision.

Il ring and get the name on Monday.

Elysander wrote: »

Congratulations on your well deserved win!

The 'Business Development Manager' was better prepared at NW's 'golden duck' in Liverpool, as she paid the winning defendant in cash after the DJ dismissed their claim!

Thanks. Prob gonna have a re-think before they take someone else to court as losing money as still cost them £50 in court fees. I almost got loss of earnings awarded. Most others would have with the judge but my situation is different currently.

Although not cash I easily would've got loss of earning if I had . He almost agreed but my situation is different currently

safarmuk wrote: »

Personally I would have given the BDM my address and asked for a cheque ,,, simply to inconvenience them to the cost of an envelope, stamp and a walk to the post office. Which is still nothing compared to the inconvenience they have caused you.

Good point. Why should I give them my personal bank account details. Will ask for a cheque to give them more inconvenience.

Lamilad

Fantastic, well done! Great to end the week on a high note.

D3QZ88D0. Guild Row Off Church Street, Preston. Didn't get the judge name.!

Could you give us the initial of your surname and whether you're Mr/Mrs/Miss then we can use your case in other defences.... e.g " the defence refers to NWCP vs Mr/Mrs/Miss "?" at Preston County Court [2017], where Judge xxxx found that...... and so on!

Umkomaas

There you go. Well done you. :T

Guess you can all rest in peace and no need to answer to my each and every little point.

Hopefully, not just yet. :rotfl:

manutd99

Lamilad wrote: »

Fantastic, well done! Great to end the week on a high note.


Could you give us the initial of your surname and whether you're Mr/Mrs/Miss then we can use your case in other defences.... e.g " the defence refers to NWCP vs Mr/Mrs/Miss "?" at Preston County Court [2017], where Judge xxxx found that...... and so on!

Thanks. Mr H. Judge name I will provide on Monday once I've rang the court

Umkomaas wrote: »

There you go. Well done you. :T


Hopefully, not just yet. :rotfl:

Oops yep just not yet lol :rotfl:

logician

Just caught up with this thread as this is now blogged by Parking Prankster.

Well done to all involved

Coupon-mad

Good to see another solid, factual Blog written by the Prankster himself.

logician

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Good to see a truthful Blog written by the Prankster himself. Not fed by someone else, e.g. the stuff in the past, such as the Jackanory version made up to cover up the truth about the Hoax Phone call was embarrassing, don't you think?

I wonder if Pranky knows and what he thinks about that now.

What hoax phone call?

pappa_golf

logician wrote: »

What hoax phone call?

the one that did not happen?

Coupon-mad

Oh yes it did; it is a documented fact (on this forum at the time) that the Moloney hearing was postponed because of it.

It completely wasted the time of the Court, the Judge and both sides. Quite a serious matter.

Someone spread the story it was a person connected to ParkingEye, but in my view that wasn't believable then, or now.

No criticism of the Parking Prankster intended at all. I know he blogged what he believed to be the case, at the time.