Unfair Speeding Fine

Stoke

jase1 wrote: »

I'm interested to know how much time would be saved by travelling at 33mph rather than 30mph.

Enough time to ensure the feds get their christmas do

AdrianC

jase1 wrote: »

I'm interested to know how much time would be saved by travelling at 33mph rather than 30mph.

The obvious answer is "about 10%"...

SailorSam

neilmcl wrote: »

Tell that Sir Alex Ferguson

Guilty. Unless you can afford the best Solicitors.

C_Mababejive

I doubt they would fine at 33mph..

facade

Do the DVLA still revoke your licence if you don't send it away for endorsement, even though there is no paper counterpart now?

Car_54

C_Mababejive wrote: »

I doubt they would fine at 33mph..

They would if it got to court, which is vanishingly unlikely.

Car_54

facade wrote: »

Do the DVLA still revoke your licence if you don't send it away for endorsement, even though there is no paper counterpart now?

I believe they do.

mark1959

neilmcl wrote: »

Tell that Sir Alex Ferguson

Who was driving on the hard shoulder?

rich13348

comeandgo wrote: »

It is if you need to move your bowels, no sure on a wee though, men can stop and wee, something to do with lorry and taxi drivers.

Although if you stop and wee and the wrong people turn up its Pulblic Urination unless you do it in a bottle and if you get really unlucky and a family stop there is a small chance that you could be done for indecent exposure.

neilmcl

spadoosh wrote: »

Are you exaggerating the length of time between letters?

Caught speeding 29/08/16
+ 2months 29/10/16 When you received notification of speeding and responded
+ 2 months 29/12/16 When you recieved a fine and could argue at magistrates
+ 2 months 29(28)/02/17. And thats today?

Dont BS, it wont help.

I was thinking the same. "A few MONTHS" plus "a few more MONTHS" plus "a couple more MONTHS" equates to over 8 months. Unless the OP is Dr Who I'm not sure how this could all have occurred since August bank holiday 2016.