We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Buy to let vs Funds 3.3%
phb71
Posts: 26 Forumite
Hi
I have the opportunity to buy to let a property with a low borrowing rate (1.3%) and £0 initial investment on a 15 years bank loan. The net yield (after tax) on the property is about 2.5% through rent income. The other thing worth noting is that the real estate area of this property isn't increasing in value since 2009 - the price per square meter doesn't seem to move up or down.
Despite the rent, I would still need to pay the bank £550/month from my own pocket for the mortgage. I've calculated that, instead of buying the property, if I invest £550/month in the market for 15 years and compound the interest, I would simply need an annual return of 3.3% to have the value equivalent of the house after 15 years.
Surely 3.3% doesn't seem unachievable, especially for index tracker funds over time, and it removes the pain and headaches of managing a buy-to-let property, especially in an area who's not gaining any value in recent years.
Thoughts?
I have the opportunity to buy to let a property with a low borrowing rate (1.3%) and £0 initial investment on a 15 years bank loan. The net yield (after tax) on the property is about 2.5% through rent income. The other thing worth noting is that the real estate area of this property isn't increasing in value since 2009 - the price per square meter doesn't seem to move up or down.
Despite the rent, I would still need to pay the bank £550/month from my own pocket for the mortgage. I've calculated that, instead of buying the property, if I invest £550/month in the market for 15 years and compound the interest, I would simply need an annual return of 3.3% to have the value equivalent of the house after 15 years.
Surely 3.3% doesn't seem unachievable, especially for index tracker funds over time, and it removes the pain and headaches of managing a buy-to-let property, especially in an area who's not gaining any value in recent years.
Thoughts?
0
Comments
-
Hi
I have the opportunity to buy to let a property with a low borrowing rate (1.3%) and £0 initial investment on a 15 years bank loan. The net yield (after tax) on the property is about 2.5% through rent income. The other thing worth noting is that the real estate area of this property isn't increasing in value since 2009 - the price per square meter doesn't seem to move up or down.
Despite the rent, I would still need to pay the bank £550/month from my own pocket for the mortgage. I've calculated that, instead of buying the property, if I invest £550/month in the market for 15 years and compound the interest, I would simply need an annual return of 3.3% to have the value equivalent of the house after 15 years.
Surely 3.3% doesn't seem unachievable, especially for index tracker funds over time, and it removes the pain and headaches of managing a buy-to-let property, especially in an area who's not gaining any value in recent years.
Thoughts?
Isn't that a contradiction?
There's £0 initial investment but you are taking on a mortgage ??????? Isnt that the investment?
Having been a small time landlord once cant say I'd ever want to do it again, all that hassle for as you say similar returns to long term stock market investment.
Its bad enough owning one house and needing to keep it in order, why double the load?
Also, unless you are putting away the maximum in your pension already, those returns will be magnified by tax relief if you put that into a pension instead of an ISA. £550 costs you £440 on BRT and £330 on HRT.0 -
I'm UK resident but french: lots of banks in France offers £0 initial investment on loans - it's much more common in France vs the UK which I found is much harder/impossible to get. Also this buy-to-let is in France so I can't even apply it on UK tax relief. I'm not really asking if this loan is a scam or not, simply would like an opinion on the investment
. 0 -
I'm sure most landlords would tell you that a buy to let involves much more than purchasing and taking the yield. What about repairs and insurance costs? Who would manage the property, you (from a distance), or someone else? Would that be another expense? A 2.5% yield could easily be swallowed up by unforeseen expenses.I came into this world with nothing and I've got most of it left.0
-
Also, is there a sitting tenant or would you have to find one?I came into this world with nothing and I've got most of it left.0
-
Lots of banks in France offers £0 initial investment on loans .
Can you explain what that means please, I don't understand. If you are committing to a mortgage for 15 years surely that's your investment. Are you just referring to no need for a deposit? Or something else?I'm not really asking if this loan is a scam or not, simply would like an opinion on the investment
.
Even worse if you'd be a landlord in France. More hassle and more cost due to the distance meaning most things would need to go through an agent with additional costs. Give it a miss.0 -
Ah. You probably want to ask a forum that knows about French property, then.I'm UK resident but french: lots of banks in France offers £0 initial investment on loans - it's much more common in France vs the UK which I found is much harder/impossible to get. Also this buy-to-let is in France so I can't even apply it on UK tax relief. I'm not really asking if this loan is a scam or not, simply would like an opinion on the investment
.0 -
so you are UK resident and thus liable to UK income tax on your rental profit. A taxable profit figure worked out under UK tax rules where interest is allowed.I'm UK resident but french: lots of banks in France offers £0 initial investment on loans - it's much more common in France vs the UK which I found is much harder/impossible to get. Also this buy-to-let is in France so I can't even apply it on UK tax relief.
You will also of course be liable for whatever property/income related taxes apply in France and you can claim that as a credit against your UK liability depending on the terms of the UK/France tax treaty
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/france-tax-treaties
tax questions best asked on the cutting tax board
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/forumdisplay.php?f=22
so you need to ask for investment opinions on the savings and investment board bearing in mind no one can legally give you investment advice as they are not appointed advisors with the legal power to do so, thus what posters on there say is mere opinion (and opinionated!)I'm not really asking if this loan is a scam or not, simply would like an opinion on the investment
.
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/forumdisplay.php?f=170 -
The yield calculated includes insurance cost and some budget set aside for repairs every year so it's close to a net yield (post tax/insurance/repair). The management of the property is done by an agency who belongs to someone in my family so no costs to find tenants/keep an eye on the property.
Yes, when I say £0 initial investment I meant no need for an initial deposit, sorry for the confusion.
The fact that I don't need to bring any cash upfront and having it managed by a family member seems quite interesting but I'm still skeptical if this is a good investment vs long-term investing in the market.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

