We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
now 37, sold my flat in 2005 - HTB/LISA
Comments
-
fun4everyone wrote: »Thanks jj, do you have a cite for this? I have read nothing that talks about such a restriction. All the material I have read says LISA can be used for two reasons, retirement and buying first property. I have not read about previous homeowners under 40 not being allowed a LISA.
Apologies, it's slightly different from what I put originally. You can open a LISA but are excluded from buying a property if you aren't a first time buyer according to BBC - you'd have to withdraw the money and suffer the penalty charge
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37318001You can have a Lifetime ISA if you are a homeowner as long as you are under 40 when you open your first LISA and you meet all other eligibility requirements specified in the draft regulations above.
You can open one but you can't use it to get the bonus to buy a property.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0 -
bigfreddiel wrote: »LISAs are not a good deal, in no way can they compare to a pension. Open a SIPP and get a load of free money from the government now, not in some time in the future.
That extra money now will grow till you can access it at 55 or later..
A SIPP mocks spots off a LISA so that it's a no brainer.
Cheers fj
The point is it's not an either/or. You save into both. LISA funds can be accessed early in an emergency. Pension savings can't.
Pension tax relief will no doubt be scaled back in the near future (probably back to a flat rate of relief) so LISAs will increasingly look more attractive (particularly if you can avoid the withdrawal charge by replacing the funds at a later date which the Treasury are still considering) and it will increasingly be LISAs, rather than pensions, that will be extended so the Treasury keep more in tax receipts today.0 -
Apologies, it's slightly different from what I put originally. You can open a LISA but are excluded from buying a property if you aren't a first time buyer according to BBC - you'd have to withdraw the money and suffer the penalty charge
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37318001
You don't have to rely on the BBC when you have the draft regulations.
You wouldn't suffer a withdrawal charge if you left it until age 60 or if the Treasury allows early withdrawals without charge if the funds are replaced at a later date, or adds in other charge-free events in the future.0 -
-
-
Which you don't get with a LISA anyway if you access early or to buy a property if you already own one and in fact are worse off due to the charge applied
These products look like a fantastic opportunity for those in the right circumstances.
Don't write them off for everyone else you risk looking daft.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards