We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Advice needed

2

Comments

  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    and presumably got the log book V5
    Which explicitly states it is NOT proof of ownership...
    v5.gif
  • But isn't it the case that if you, as an innocent party buy a stolen car, it can just be confiscated and returned to the original owner. Why is this no different?
    It's different because the car hasn't been stolen.
    You gave the car to a dealer for them to sell and if they did this then the person who now has it is the legal owner as the person who sold them the car had the legal right to do so.
    Your not getting the money from that dealer is a different matter and will not impact on the sale of the car.

    However, if the car was sold by an administrator or liquidator and they were not aware of the contract between you and the dealer, they may not have had the legal right to sell it and may be liable so you really need to see if you can find out exactly how the car came into the possession of the person who now has it.
  • Mercdriver
    Mercdriver Posts: 3,898 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    But isn't it the case that if you, as an innocent party buy a stolen car, it can just be confiscated and returned to the original owner. Why is this no different?

    even if this were fraud, and that's still a pretty big if, and difficult to prove, fraud is different to theft.
  • Fat_Walt
    Fat_Walt Posts: 750 Forumite
    Mercdriver wrote: »
    even if this were fraud, and that's still a pretty big if, and difficult to prove, fraud is different to theft.

    Go on explain how?
  • It seems like semantics to me.
  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 9,053 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The OP had a contract with the garage to sell the car on his behalf. It seems the garage has done that, but has not passed the proceeds to the OP.

    It seems to me that the OP has a good claim against the administrators for the money, but none against the new owner who has acquired the car quite legitimately.
  • Ganga
    Ganga Posts: 4,253 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Had a similar thing happen to a work mate,took his car to the dealer he bought it from who agreed to buy it,agreed a price and gave him a cheque,he held on to the log book/v form,checked at the bank a couple of days latter to see if the cheque had cleared and was told YES,he returned to the garage and handed over the documents all ok! No bank contacted him several days later cheque had bounced went back to garage dealer had gone bust,administrator would not give him his car back,bank said sorry but he was thousands out of pocket and learned a hard but not self inflicted lesson
  • molerat
    molerat Posts: 35,721 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    IMO it all comes down to who sold the car. If the garage sold it then op is just another unsecured creditor. If the administrators sold it then I believe they have failed due diligence and should compensate op, I am sure their liability insurance would cover such matters.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    molerat wrote: »
    IMO it all comes down to who sold the car. If the garage sold it then op is just another unsecured creditor. If the administrators sold it then I believe they have failed due diligence and should compensate op, I am sure their liability insurance would cover such matters.
    If the car had still been on-site and unsold at the time the administrators took over, then I would have expected them to call the OP and say "Please take your car back.", not sell it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.