Mil Collections - Letter Before action

spook104

Oh ok I'm with you now....

So unless all the ducks line up, it could be a mess of who requested, what name was on the sign and who assigned the debt.

The name at the bottom is Gavin Stuart Price. and it was dated 22/09/2014

DoaM

PG ... many of your responses are quite cryptic. I'm sure everyone would benefit if you spelled out in bullet points what you're trying to say - what angle you're exploring with all this.

Edit - maybe OP has got it ... but an explanation much earlier would have saved about 15 posts in the thread.

pappa_golf

maybe the boss sacked after that https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/officers/bsVa8ZjzJOWKbe2bWh5Xk6hWoJo/appointments

pappa_golf

DoaM wrote: »

PG ... many of your responses are quite cryptic. I'm sure everyone would benefit if you spelled out in bullet points what you're trying to say - what angle you're exploring with all this.

Edit - maybe OP has got it ... but an explanation much earlier would have saved about 15 posts in the thread.

if you are better at playing 20 questions , take over


bye

DoaM

If you'd clearly explained your strategy at the outset then 20 questions wouldn't have been needed.

spook104

pappa_golf wrote: »

if you are better at playing 20 questions , take over
bye

I'm normally on the other side of this (I work in IT and getting the information you want can be painful) so I appreciate the help. Especially given this is your own time and who your helping doesn't understand all (read most) of the subject at hand.

pappa_golf

DoaM wrote: »

If you'd clearly explained your strategy at the outset then 20 questions wouldn't have been needed.

stratagy was to get the correct info , this has been going on since late last year http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=71538183&postcount=17

hence asking specific questions , which form , date , etc etc

so please take over now DoaM

DoaM

No thanks - no need to. Just because you don't like anyone questioning you, there's no need to ...





Anyway - nice to see PG back; I guess the "cat" is sleeping for a while now?

spook104

So this is the start of my witness statement....

I'm struggling with content given that I have had nothing from Mil and I don't expect I will do before the 14 days deadline.

I plan to submit my skeleton once I've seen their bundle, but as I'm sure this will be after the 14 day deadline what happens with exhibits? Can I add new exhibits that relate to my skeleton argument if I didn't submit them prior to the 14 day deadline? If not should I just add everything I'm going to need or think I'm going to need as Exhibit items even if they aren't used in the witness statement?

WITNESS STATEMENT
1. I, am the defendant in this claim. The fact in this statement come from my personal knowledge, or are true to the best of my information and belief
2. I am not liable to the Claimant for the sum claimed, or any amount at all and this is my Witness Statement in support of my defence as already filed
3. I am the registered keeper of the vehicle in question in this case.
4. I was not the driver at the time indicated in the Particulars of Claim, I did travel in the vehicle immediately following the time indicated.
5. Exhibit ML001 is a copy of my google location history for the period directly proceeding the time and date indicated. It clearly show that it took me 20 minutes to walk to the area around the Market Place Carpark from my previous location.
6. Exhibit ML002 is a copy of my google location history for the period directly after the time and date indicated. It clearly shows that I was traveling in a vehicle, and it is admitted that it was the vehicle in question, as a passenger.
7. I assert that when the driver and I went to the vehicle there was no PCN attached.
8. I assert that I received no Notice to Keeper from One Parking Limited or one of their various trading/company names
9. It is my belief that I have had no valid “Notice of Assignment” from One Parking Limited, as the “Notice of Assignment” was sent by the claimant
10. The Claimant has consistently refused or ignored attempts to communicate on the issues in this case. Exhibit ML003, Exhibit ML004, ML005 and Exhibit ML006, both before and after beginning this claim.

Coupon-mad

I think I would add:

I requested from the DVLA information on who had obtained my information around the alleged date. They sent me a letter and a copy of the v888/3 used, which I have ascertained means my data was obtained under DVLA rules which do not allow my data to be bought & sold like a commodity. I have discovered that the DVLA has stated just last month (February 2017) to another victim of MIL's questionable business practice:

Thank you for your email. I can confirm that MIL have stated...

“Only where we have positive information supplied by the motorist to either the seller or ourselves are continuing with those cases. We are assuming by default that data that has been supplied is DVLA unless we know otherwise”

If the data being used has not been obtained directly from DVLA, the Agency could not provide any instructions on this data. If however, the data is vehicle keeper data that has been obtained directly from DVLA, this should not be used as permission was not provided by the DVLA for this to be passed to MIL.

Unfortunately, I cannot provide any further advice on this matter but I hope this helps

Kind regards

David Dunford
Data Sharing Strategy & Compliance
Strategy, Policy & Communications Directorate | D16 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1DY
Twitter: @dvlagovuk