We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Disgraceful Bank chief must quit
Options
Comments
-
And I dont see anything wrong with the head of the BOE warning of possible shocks to the economy. It is part of his job.
But did he consider that his choice of words might actually be causing the very shocks he was predicting?This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
But did he consider that his choice of words might actually be causing the very shocks he was predicting?
I don't think that's right.
If he's saying it then it shouldn't come as a market shock.
The market does not like uncertainty.
By sending out messages, he's pre-warning everyone - that's his job.
I'm not saying he does it perfectly - he's a human not a robot, but it is an important part of his role.0 -
I don't think that's right.
If he's saying it then it shouldn't come as a market shock.
The market does not like uncertainty.
By sending out messages, he's pre-warning everyone - that's his job.
I'm not saying he does it perfectly - he's a human not a robot, but it is an important part of his role.
it's extremely unlikely that most decision makers in the world didn't know that the UK was holding a brexit referendum.
Carneys' intervention was like the OECD, IMF etc politically motivated to deliberately create pro-stay sentiment
whilst I accept he is a servant of the government and that the piper calls the tune, lets just be honest that his words did harm to the UK.0 -
Carneys' intervention was like the OECD, IMF etc politically motivated to deliberately create pro-stay sentiment
whilst I accept he is a servant of the government and that the piper calls the tune, lets just be honest that his words did harm to the UK.
I agree. And his words backfired because he was out of touch with the changing mood of public sentiment. He had failed to notice that bankers, including central bankers, were no longer flavour of the month.
He is too prone to believing that because he wants something to be true, therefore it is. He is currently repeating the mistake, believing that continuing ultra-low interest rates can stimulate the economy.
He has run out of ammunition, but refuses to acknowledge that all he has now are blanks.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards