We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
KNOCK KNOCK Mrs May, anyone at home ??? what are you doing about these CCJ's
Comments
-
Computersaysno wrote: »This does NOTHING to address the 'debtor not at this address' issue??? Which was one of the big issues leading to many set asides and thereby wasting court time.
Or am I missing something?
Someone is missing something as it does not address the
problem that was highlighted by the Daily Mail who said ...
"Our reporters discovered that families are being financially crippled by rulings they knew nothing about. Some lost their homes and even their businesses"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3786132/I-ll-end-credit-rating-scandal-pledges-PM-acts-Mail-exposes-rulings-ruined-lives.html
Baroness Altmann said the CCJ scandal was an 'absolute outrage'
12 months down the line since that report and nothing
has happened ???
Despite all the hoops these claimers will have to go through,
the "unknown" CCJ has not been dealt with so we must
assume the problem will continue0 -
They felt that the new Protocol had to apply to all types of debt claims, not specifically PPCs, and that service to the last known address was acceptable.
There is also the factor that the Court Service is now run as a profit centre, hence the recent increase in the set-aside fee from £80 to £155, then to £255. They quite like having a few of those to top up the coffers.
It is being suggested that the new independent CoP should mandate that any PCNs which are over X months old cannot be the subject of a Claim unless the current address has been verified. We'll see what happens with that.
Unbelievable "last known address was acceptable." ???
Theresa May has pledged to root out abuse of county court judgments"
THE ABUSE = last known address. She failed to root this out
Maybe the MoJ should read the daily mail article again to fully
understand the devastation suffered by people.
Jesus, and these people are running this country ??0 -
Jesus, and these people are running this country ??
Wherever did you get the preposterous notion that the PM, or any politicians, are 'running the country'?
PMs, Ministers and other MPs are here today, gone tomorrow at the stroke of an X on a ballot paper. Many Civil Servants have careers in Government spanning 30 or 40 years. That's where the real power lies.
Have you never seen those factual documentaries Yes, Minister and Yes, Prime Minister?
I have been providing assistance, including Lay Representation at Court hearings (current score: won 57, lost 14), to defendants in parking cases for over 5 years. I have an LLB (Hons) degree, and have a Graduate Diploma in Civil Litigation from CILEx. However, any advice given on these forums by me is NOT formal legal advice, and I accept no liability for its accuracy.0 -
Wherever did you get the preposterous notion that the PM, or any politicians, are 'running the country'?
PMs, Ministers and other MPs are here today, gone tomorrow at the stroke of an X on a ballot paper. Many Civil Servants have careers in Government spanning 30 or 40 years. That's where the real power lies.
Have you never seen those factual documentaries Yes, Minister and Yes, Prime Minister?
HAHA .... great old comedies but this is like
"Only fools and horses" and the word "plonker" comes to mind
My uncle was a civil servant for 40 years and he suffered
the boredom only because of the pension
Sadly he got dementia which really did not make much
difference as his knowledge of what he did in the service
had faded well before that.
All these people live in their own little world, not the real world0 -
This Thread has now shown that Theresa May and the MoJ
have failed the public in not addressing the CCJ scandal
SHAME ON THE GOVERNMENT, SHAME ON MRS MAY0 -
I knew that would be the outcome.PPCs say its carpark management, BPA say its raising standards..... we all know its just about raking in the revenue. :eek:0
-
Mrs May >> when is this woman's government going to act on CCJ's that she promised ???
If she is too busy screwing up Brexit, give the job to a professional, that is assuming there are professionals in her government
May's failed promise was over 2 years ago ?? disgusting0 -
Mrs May >> when is this woman's government going to act on CCJ's that she promised ???
If she is too busy screwing up Brexit, give the job to a professional, that is assuming there are professionals in her government
May's failed promise was over 2 years ago ?? disgustingpappa_golf wrote: »or quickly forgot about ,
do you honestly think the goverment will "do" anything ?
answered many many mths ago
the statement she made was to pacify the woman in the report NOTHING will be done0 -
twhitehousescat wrote: »answered many many mths ago
the statement she made was to pacify the woman in the report NOTHING will be done
I know ...... bringing her failure and lie to the front again0 -
on the daily fail page spouting this , there was a link to casehub , promising everybody the earth , umm , link is now dead
it was a bloody publicity stunt , set up to sell the crap paper0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 258K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards