We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
To pay or not to pay indemnity insurance for a historical right of way? Help please!
Options

Bobbingalong
Posts: 4 Newbie
Hello clever money people
I'm selling my house and my Buyer's solicitor is requiring indemnity insurance for a historical right of way across my property to my neighbour's garden. When I bought this property 9 years ago, my solicitor didn't ask for indemnity insurance and I'm very reluctant to pay it now, especially as this right has never been exercised in all the time I've been here. Do I need to pay it??? There's a gate for this right of way in the fence to the right of my house, bolted my side, with another gate in the fence to the left into my neighbour's garden, bolted her side. My neighbour has a front door and a back door and has no need to come through my garden to access her home. Advice would be MUCH appreciated! Thank yoooou ...

0
Comments
-
You can say that you don't believe it to be necessary and would expect the buyer to pay for their own indemnity insurance.
Sounds a bit stupid anyway as the garden is accessible through the two gates.0 -
If someone decides to use that ROW in the future - then they have the right to do so.
I rather doubt whether a legal "fight" about it would go in your favour - in which case "Why bother to take out the indemnity insurance? - as your buyer would have to reinstate access to the ROW anyway?"0 -
Bobbingalong wrote: »my Buyer's solicitor is requiring indemnity insurance for a historical right of way across my property
Indemnity insurance against what exactly?Every generation blames the one before...
Mike + The Mechanics - The Living Years0 -
Yes, the right of way remains - there are gates. What financial loss would there be if someone decided to pull their dustbin through the end of your garden? I don't see what it would be insuring against.0
-
As above I can't imagine what the insurance would be for.
The buyers need to accept that at some point in the future your neighbours may want to come through the garden and if they do so you can't stop them.
Having an indemnity insurance policy wouldn't alter the fact that they come through your garden.
The only thing I can think of is that it might insure against loss of value of the house, but I can't see how it would make that much difference.Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.0 -
Are you talking about a public RoW, or a RoW for some specific named individual or group only?
What costs would be being indemnified by this policy?0 -
Our vendors had to purchase some for an extension that was built with no planning permission. It only cost a couple of hundred pounds and although we probably would've paid if they didn't agree to, the next buyers would probably ask for the same thing.0
-
Our vendors had to purchase some for an extension that was built with no planning permission. It only cost a couple of hundred pounds and although we probably would've paid if they didn't agree to, the next buyers would probably ask for the same thing.
Illicit extensions are a very different scenario to ROW's. I believe an illicit extension becomes "fixed" and nothing can be done about it after a few years. ROW's continue permanently.0 -
moneyistooshorttomention wrote: »Illicit extensions are a very different scenario to ROW's. I believe an illicit extension becomes "fixed" and nothing can be done about it after a few years. ROW's continue permanently.
An indemnity for a right of way would cover you for what costs?Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.0 -
Many thanks for all the helpful replies. It turns out the indemnity insurance is to do with access to the house via a joint path, not the ROW across the back of the property. Apparently the 1957 Conveyance doesn't mention the right to use the joint path, although it does clearly show in a diagram attached that the joint path is part of my property. My solicitors said they agreed with me that I not pay this insurance, then today told me the Buyer's solicitor is correct in asking me to pay!!! When I bought this house, my solicitor didn't ask for indemnity insurance re the joint path but apparently that was her omission. Hey ho, I'll pay it - it's 'only' £100 - just to move things along.
Thanks again, y'all.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards