We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Can I save for my brother?

Options
Hello, I am new here and looking for some advice please :)

My brother has had some financial difficulty in the past and is struggling to make things work. He has a lodger and has asked if I would take the rent from the lodger and keep it safe in a savings account for a few months so that he doesn't spend it. (previous spendaholic/gambling issues etc)

My question is - can I legally save money on someone else's behalf without tax implications on him or me, or me having to fill in endless forms or open trust funds etc, he wants me to save and hold up to £4k for him. I was hoping I could simply open up a regular saver and pop the money in there until he wants it... ?!

Any advice/experience of this greatly appreciated :)
Thank you!

Comments

  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 36,966 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If you put it in a saving account in your name then it's regarded as your money, so you'd be taxed on interest income, it would be seen as your capital for, say, means testing, and he'd have no claim on it if you were to die, for example. The likelihood of each of these being significant or even relevant, especially at £4K, would seem low (in the absence of any other details), but worth bearing in mind if you're looking for the legalistic view rather than the pragmatic....
  • JohnRo
    JohnRo Posts: 2,887 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    As above, as long as he isn't avoiding any taxes due on his economic activity or intentionally depriving himself of assets to cheat a potential means tested benefit entitlement, either now or in future, then he can give you any amount he chooses for you to do with as you please.

    IHT rules could become a factor depending on the eventual estate sums and time scales involved.
    'We don't need to be smarter than the rest; we need to be more disciplined than the rest.' - WB
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,602 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Your brother can lend you the money - you could draw up and sign an agreement on a repayable on demand basis.
  • Thanks very much to you all!
  • newuser78
    newuser78 Posts: 187 Forumite
    Why can your brother not open an account in his name but you keep the card, pin, password, etc?
  • teddysmum
    teddysmum Posts: 9,521 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    He could put the money into a bond which charges a high penalty, for early termination, meaning he'd take out less than he put in.
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    newuser78 wrote: »
    Why can your brother not open an account in his name but you keep the card, pin, password, etc?

    If he has serious self-control issues then he could still ring the bank up, or walk into a branch and withdraw the money, or use the "lost password" system to gain access to the account. Whether or not he has the card, PIN etc does not change the fact that he would be entitled to his money.

    Just as if you forget the password to your online-only bank account, it is still your money, you don't forfeit it to the bank. How the bank satisfies itself that you are the owner despite the lack of the password is between you and it.

    To reiterate the answer for the OP, no, there aren't any tax implications other than that you would be liable for any tax on the interest. (Only an issue if you're above your personal savings allowance, and if you are you just deduct it from the amount you owe him.) For an amount like this I would happily stick my brother's money in a bank account and scribble a handwritten IOU to be signed by both of us.
    teddysmum wrote:
    He could put the money into a bond which charges a high penalty, for early termination, meaning he'd take out less than he put in.

    The problem is that he expects to withdraw the money in "a few months" - not for gambling purposes. So a fixed term bond is not suitable. In any case if you were going down this route you might as well choose one that allows no access whatsoever except on death, otherwise he might still be tempted to withdraw and pay the penalty. But as the brother is likely to want access to the money this is a moot point.
  • LHW99
    LHW99 Posts: 5,213 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Why not open a joint account that needs both to sign?
  • bigfreddiel
    bigfreddiel Posts: 4,263 Forumite
    teddysmum wrote: »
    He could put the money into a bond which charges a high penalty, for early termination, meaning he'd take out less than he put in.

    If someone has problems with money, debt then a penalty taking it out will not have any affect. It's like an addiction fj
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.