Advice on how to approach this issue

AylesburyDuck

Guest101 wrote: »

Yes but direct contact is a whole range of people, teaching assistants, parent volunteers, secretaries, dining room supervisors...

Ah, lol, but it really isnt, are you trying to imply that a dinner lady should be briefed on every single special needs child.
Do me a favour! :rotfl:

Guest101

AylesburyDuck wrote: »

Ah, lol, but it really isnt, are you trying to imply that a dinner lady should be briefed on every single special needs child.
Do me a favour! :rotfl:

Did I say that?


I'm saying that a lot of people in a school have direct contact with a child. To some degree, if there are behavioural issues, they would need to be made aware.


That doesn't mean discussing the ins and outs of the specifics.

Guest101

AylesburyDuck wrote: »

But in this case its not public information is it. Well i suppose it is now seeing as how the school has now told the father , which i happen to know (for a fact, as a concerned parent wanting her childs privacy) they can get into a lot of trouble for.
I shall take your postings on this matter with the big pinch of salt they deserve, feel free to do likewise. :rotfl:

How do you know it's not public information? Do you know the child and the school?


What right of privacy do you think you and your child have?

Mupette

Guest101 wrote: »

Did I say that?


I'm saying that a lot of people in a school have direct contact with a child. To some degree, if there are behavioural issues, they would need to be made aware.


That doesn't mean discussing the ins and outs of the specifics.

The OP has already said his wife doesn't have direct contact with the child, hence why she wouldn't know

AylesburyDuck

Guest101 wrote: »

Did I say that?


I'm saying that a lot of people in a school have direct contact with a child. To some degree, if there are behavioural issues, they would need to be made aware.


That doesn't mean discussing the ins and outs of the specifics.

You kind of did yes,
Mmm ok, backpeddleing.
Whatever :rotfl:

Guest101

Mupette wrote: »

The OP has already said his wife doesn't have direct contact with the child, hence why she wouldn't know

When I posted it I did not know that.


A lot of parents volunteer in their own childs classrooms

Stevie_Palimo

Guest101 wrote: »

I didn't say they would all know the ins and outs, but it's quite common to say:


This child receives additional one to one support. That would indicate that the child has additional needs and possibly issues

You are talking nonsense as you do quite often and then try and backtrack upon what you said previously to try and make it look better for yourself, At no point will people who work in a School all know the individual needs and situations of every child as it is simply down to a need to know basis only.

When you were at School things may have been different but I can assure you that your posts on this matter are pure guess work at best and have no relevance as to what is actually happening in todays Schools.

Guest101

AylesburyDuck wrote: »

You kind of did yes,
Mmm ok, backpeddleing.
Whatever :rotfl:

I don't backpedal.


I said that a whole range of people have direct contact with a child. Which they do.

baby_lemonade

paddy's_mum wrote: »

Where did a 9 year old boy (the other kid) learn all this vicious stuff?

Internet. TV. 18-cert films. Any of the things feckless parents let their children have unsupervised access to. Assuming any of this is true, of course.

AylesburyDuck

Guest101 wrote: »

How do you know it's not public information? Do you know the child and the school?


What right of privacy do you think you and your child have?

I'm sorry, im just finding your rambleings hilarious now, of course its not public information, and it never will be, unless the school is especially stupid as it appears it actually maybe.:(
Just because you think of a situation that fits in your head, doesnt make it so.