We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Couple of questions on asset allocation

Options
2»

Comments

  • bigadaj
    bigadaj Posts: 11,531 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My way of thinking is to include in the asset mix everything that can be sold.

    How much are you valuing your body at?

    And is that for sexual favours or medical research?
  • anything that can be sold... legally...
  • bigadaj
    bigadaj Posts: 11,531 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    anything that can be sold... legally...

    Ok, so you're including prostitution but excluding organ sales I presume.
  • If you have to ask the price, you can't afford it... ;)
  • bigadaj
    bigadaj Posts: 11,531 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    And sadly amortising with age.
  • mmo_2
    mmo_2 Posts: 23 Forumite
    What is going on in this thread? :D
  • badger09
    badger09 Posts: 11,577 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mmo wrote: »
    What is going on in this thread? :D

    The usual:D
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    My way of thinking is to include in the asset mix everything that can be sold. So a house would be in there.

    If I took this approach my recent portfolio would have looked something like 20% UK equities, 50% overseas equities, blah blah, 5% music CDs, 2% cars (well, car), 1% furniture. While potentially interesting in a very self-indulgent and nerdy way, it tells me very little about how I should allocate my investments.

    There is a difference between investments which you hold purely because you expect them to appreciate or provide income and possessions which you hold for their utility.

    The purpose of asset allocation is not to count up your possessions like Scrooge McDuck, the purpose is to tell you how you should allocate further investments or whether you should switch existing ones to diversify. Including personal possessions brings no useful information to that calculation.

    All investment portfolios have an objective (even if that objective is the indeterminate "to achieve long term growth for an unknown need in the distant future or failing that to pass to my heirs"). In my case the aim of the portfolio was "to save for a house deposit", and implicit in that aim is "...without selling my CDs or my car". So including possessions in my portfolio makes no sense as I was never going to sell them in order to spend on the house deposit.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.