We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Parking Eye claiming wrong reg was input in to the ticket machine.
Comments
-
Do you mean a bit like that ParkingEye -v- Barry Beavis case? OK, got that one!
Barry Beavis, wasn't he the bloke who overstayed by 50 minutes and ignored all subsequent correspondence from the PPC? Sorry, I do not see the connection.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
Do you mean a bit like that ParkingEye -v- Barry Beavis case? OK, got that one!
Barry Beavis, wasn't he the bloke who overstayed by 50 minutes and ignored all subsequent correspondence from the PPC? Sorry, I do not see the connection.
I think you've already provided the connection:the word of a disreputable scammer against a fine upstanding member of the public.
He was delayed from returning to his car by a breakdown of machinery in ProntaPrint, a retailer of the said car park, where he was waiting for some marketing material to be printed.
Or are you saying that anyone who ignores a 'disreputable scammer's' correspondence is not a 'fine upstanding member of the public'?
Or is it that Barry Beavis is but a mere chip shop owner?
Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Point of order: It was staplesI think you've already provided the connection:
He was delayed from returning to his car by a breakdown of machinery in ProntaPrint, a retailer of the said car park, where he was waiting for some marketing material to be printed.
Or are you saying that anyone who ignores a 'disreputable scammer's' correspondence is not a 'fine upstanding member of the public'?
Or is it that Barry Beavis is but a mere chip shop owner?0 -
Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
They wouldn't have a leg to stand on if they were foolish enough to take this to court. The system is designed to fail to ParkingEye's advantage, any judge would see that.0
-
I agree with Dazter, the Muppets have already agreed that the OP did pay but seem to want £20 towards their admin costs to confirm this.
If they want to put in technology that is prone to human error for whatever reason, when that happens and a motorist has paid in full they should accept it. In theory that's exactly what the first stage appeal is for mitigation.
Of course in Greed Land as we know it's different.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards