We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Do you 'top slice'?
Options
Comments
-
Would you buy the shares now at the current price?
If so, then probably hold0 -
Update: shares rose 10% this morning on the very upbeat interim financials. I just sold half and I'm very happy to let the rest of my holding run further, if things continue in the same vein. I'm a happy investor :beer:0
-
I like that rule of thumb: if in doubt about doing something, do half of it!
That way you are a little bit happy whichever way things pan out.0 -
I have sold a few that have overperformed but sold enough so that I have got my original investment value back. The monies left invested then have cost you nothing bar lost interest and trading charges. In a similar quandry now with Provident Finance and Dominos. Sold Greggs after their fly on the wall documentary didn't impress me and the shares rose by 200% much to my dismay. so you are damned if you do and damned if you don;t.Solar PV cost £5760 (15/03/13)
FIT inc + Electricity saved £3746 (65% Paid back) Tax free
Last update 30/09/170 -
Bazofts_Revenge wrote: »I have sold a few that have overperformed but sold enough so that I have got my original investment value back. The monies left invested then have cost you nothing bar lost interest and trading charges.
that's false mental accounting
by that logic, when you sell enough shares to get back more than your original investment, then the remaining shares have a negative cost: i.e. you're being paid to take them off somebody's hands - which makes no sense, for shares in a limited-liability company.
it's more logical to apportion the costs in proportion to the number of shares. i.e. if you've sold half the original shares, regard the remaining holding as having half the original cost.
but strictly speaking, it doesn't matter - except for tax purposes - what you paid for some shares. the only issue is: are you better off keeping the X shares you now hold, or taking the £Y you could sell them for and doing something else with the cash?
i think the main good reason to top slice is to limit your risk. if a holding grows too big, you can be over-exposed to losses if the company does badly (or even: does well, but not as well as the market was hoping).
it can also be sensible - in a taxable account - to take gains within each year's capital gains tax allowance, and use the proceeds to feed ISAs and pensions.0 -
Ray_Singh-Blue wrote: »I like that rule of thumb: if in doubt about doing something, do half of it!
That way you are a little bit happy whichever way things pan out.
Or a little bit annoyed.0 -
-
I have took the profit and banked it0
-
I dont always do this, but I do do it- esp with cyclicals and commodities like gold etc.0
-
Ray_Singh-Blue wrote: »I like that rule of thumb: if in doubt about doing something, do half of it!
That way you are a little bit happy whichever way things pan out.Or a little bit annoyed.Ray_Singh-Blue wrote: »And .
But at least you can still stand up while kicking yourself:rotfl:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards