We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
P2P: Saving Stream (AKA SavingStream)
Options
Comments
-
to me if you are a higher rate tax payer or more, it just does not make sense to invest in Lendy. you get taxed 40% so that leaves you maximum 7.2%. is that worth the risk?
yes you can put it in a pension, but since pension is for the long term, why not just stick with stocks and bonds - keep it simple. until they come out with an isa, i think its best to avoid especially as an additional rate tax payer.
Depends on your view.
I don't think anyone is recommending Lendy on this thread, the debate seems to have widened to p2p in general.
In terms of p2p then unsecured lending is questionable as well as that paying low interest rates.
Bonds generally offer terrible value currently, either zero or negative returns or a far higher risk profile than you'd be traditionally be looking for in your bond allocation or a combination of these.
An additional rate taxpayer may think this unattractive but for a higher rate taxpayer then it can definitely form part of a portfolio. Many will be investing into a pension for the higher rate relief, which might reduce the tax impact from unwrapped p2p, and any defaults can of course be written off against interest which reduces the risk somewhat.0 -
Back on topic, I see the security for another Lendy defaulted loan has been put on the market. RICS valuation £2,870,000, loan value £2,000,000, on the market for £1,250,000. There seems to be a pattern emerging.0
-
I don't think anyone is recommending Lendy on this thread, the debate seems to have widened to p2p in general.0
-
PBL064 Tenanted offices, 2 units, Highbridge, Somerset.
It's not difficult to identify, although I notice SS have removed the image from the details page.
http://www.zoopla.co.uk/for-sale/commercial/details/43511221?search_identifier=d657ba491e0d01b89159f6ec1dfc5343#VMFcew3R6B6Y64om.97[B]Asset Details % Book Asset value Loan Value % pa LTV[/B] In Default 5.12% £13,490,000.00 £9,071,500.00 12.00% 67.25% Interest Accruing 8.34% £22,780,000.00 £14,777,000.00 12.00% 64.87% Interest Serviced 3.63% £12,755,000.00 £6,426,107.00 12.00% 50.38% Interest on Account 82.92% £365,332,433.00 £139,392,121.00 11.64% 40.23% Loan Book Total 100.00% £414,357,433.00 £177,247,547.00 11.70% 42.78%
'We don't need to be smarter than the rest; we need to be more disciplined than the rest.' - WB0 -
PBL064 is still 12 days away from being classed as an official default by Lendy according to their 180 day rule so the IA classification is to be expected.'We don't need to be smarter than the rest; we need to be more disciplined than the rest.' - WB0
-
to me if you are a higher rate tax payer or more, it just does not make sense to invest in Lendy. you get taxed 40% so that leaves you maximum 7.2%. is that worth the risk?That's Sod's Law, isn't it? When it was the main general P2P thread, it began to focus on SavingStream (as it then was). So the thread was renamed. Now it's really specifically a Lendy thread, as you say, the debate has widened again to P2P in general. You can't win!
TOPICS: generic P2P, Ablrate, Lendy (formerly Saving Stream), MoneyThing.0 -
[B]Asset Details % Book Asset value Loan Value % pa LTV[/B] In Default 5.12% £13,490,000.00 £9,071,500.00 12.00% 67.25% Interest Accruing 8.34% £22,780,000.00 £14,777,000.00 12.00% 64.87% Interest Serviced 3.63% £12,755,000.00 £6,426,107.00 12.00% 50.38% Interest on Account 82.92% £365,332,433.00 £139,392,121.00 11.64% 40.23% Loan Book Total 100.00% £414,357,433.00 £177,247,547.00 11.70% 42.78%
Thats an improvement from 21% to 17% on troubled loans0 -
Thats an improvement from 21% to 17% on troubled loans
On one level but you'd need to do more analysis than that.
Depending on whether you are defending or criticising them then a range of other criteria could be assessed including number of loans, time in default, whatever that actually means given the platforms interpretation, value of loans or security, actual value of security given the apparently questionable valuation reports, consideration of the provision fund, etc0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards