We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

BW Legal LBA?

Hello,

I have searched the forums with lots of information regarding BW Legal and Excel and I have received a letter saying how they have been passed this from Excel.

I think its a letter before action but I am unsure.

It states" As you failed to make payment or raise an appeal within 28 days from the date of the PCN (but I did appeal) the balance due remains outstanding and we require payment in full within 16 days from the date of this letter. If you fail to make payment or provide reasons for non payment within the specified timeframe, we will seek Our Clients instructions to commence legal proceedings against you in the form of a County Court Claim Form in the County Court."

Firstly is this a LBA?

Secondly can they request the additional £54? As they state is detailed in the car park terms and conditions.

If it is an LBA what do I do now?

Also this is from the collections team is this normal?

Thanks

James
«134

Comments

  • pappa_golf
    pappa_golf Posts: 8,895 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    you did appeal , did they reply?


    who was the nasty company?
    Save a Rachael

    buy a share in crapita
  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    edited 11 July 2016 at 8:51AM
    Firstly is this a LBA?
    No. (From the sentence you quoted, and BW are debt collectors)
  • arthurx1234
    arthurx1234 Posts: 421 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Quentin wrote: »
    No. (From the sentence you quoted, and BW are debt collectors)
    And registered Solicitors (says so on bottom of letter)

    Arthur Brexit
    BREXIT OOPS
  • Thank you for your replies.


    I did appeal and they did deny it. Its BW Solicitors who sent the letter but the originator is Excel Parking for apparently parking in the Peel Centre with no signage at KFC a few years ago!


    So with them being registered solicitors and debt collectors what should I do with regard to this letter? Ignore it? Or respond to it?


    If it would help I could upload a copy of the letter with my details remarked out?


    Thanks Again


    James
  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 155,452 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    You should read the dozens upon dozens of other BW Legal Excel threads and follow what they did. Just search the forum 'BW Legal Excel'.
    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • Thank you for that.


    Are they both debt collectors and solicitors then?


    If they are debt collectors I presume the letter is from the debt collection arm? If this is correct can a solicitor be a debt collector legally? As this seems very strange to me...


    James
  • pappa_golf
    pappa_golf Posts: 8,895 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    wright hastle are solicitor's and debt collectors , so are gladstones , so are ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
    Save a Rachael

    buy a share in crapita
  • I have had a look around and I am presuming that I respond to them with something like this:


    Dear BW Legal,

    The debt is denied. The amount charged bears no relation to the parking fee.


    Your debt collection costs of £54 are not appropriate. The amount is also excessive. I refer you to ParkingEye v Somerfield where debt collection costs of £60 were found to probably be a penalty by HHJ Heggarty.

    Complaint
    I wish to raise a formal complaint regarding your letter. Requiring a response within 10 days to a letter before claim is against practice directions, which require a minimum of 14 days.

    Additionally, you are misrepresenting the legal process. A CCJ is not automatically entered following a successful hearing. The losing party has 14 days to make payment and if they do this has no effect on credit or employability.

    Please follow your formal complaints procedure. If I am not happy with your response, I will escalate to the CSE.



    I have read from here:


    http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=104441


    by hoohoo


    I am wondering though do I need to state that I have appealed and they have rejected my appeal and also that there is inadequate signage where I parked?


    As this is to do with Excel and the Peel Centre Stockport again. Its just with them being solicitors and debt collectors the advice from different people seems to be ignore or send a letter so I am unsure which approach to take.


    Thanks


    James
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    just send the letter and dont add to it or admit anything

    the time to issue your defence bullet points is if they start an MCOL and you will cite your bullet points in the initial defence

    never assist a PPC or their agents
  • Thanks I am now at home and looking through the letter and it says:

    "County Court Proceedings

    In the event County Court proceedings are issued you maybe liable for court fees, further solicitors costs and statutory interest. Should we successfully obtain a County Court Judgement ("CCJ"), this may have a detrimental effect on your future creditwortiness and employability. Our Client also reserves a right to commence enforcement proceedings against you for recovery of the balance due."

    In my original post I stated from the letter "we require payment in full within 16 days from the date of this letter."

    So with this in mind would the below letter be the best to send as it seems to differ from what my letter states?

    "Complaint
    I wish to raise a formal complaint regarding your letter. Requiring a response within 10 days to a letter before claim is against practice directions, which require a minimum of 14 days."

    In my letter it states 16 days to require payment in full. Would this be the same thing?

    Thanks

    James
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.