PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

70s house

I am in the process of buying a 70s house. I think it was built in 1971 or 1972.

Are there anything I should know before going any further into the process? Any potential troubles?

My concerns are
1. It has a flat roof, not 100% may be 75%?
2. As the potential of natural ground subsidence is medium to high in the area and the house is positioned on the slight sloping land. I am worried about the subsidence already.
3. Asbestos. Is it so common in that era?
4. Flood risk comes as low but it did shock me since I thought is was Flood free.

I love the location of the house however I don't want to have troubles. Before I spend another £1000 on survey, are there anyone with 70s houses help me please?
«1

Comments

  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    You can't really compare houses from across the board in any given decade. 2 years earlier and it'd be a 60's property. Besides which regions vary massively in design and construction materials used.

    1 Needs investigating

    2 Needs investigating if you're already worried. But if no historical it's unlikely.

    3 Very possibly, what's the concern?

    4 I've yet to know anywhere classified as "flood free"
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,550 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Subsidence already posted here;

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5477385

    As for flat roof, they're less durable than sloping roofs. Perhaps need replacing every 20-25 years rather than 75-100 years. Ask when it was last done.

    Asbestos is fine if you leave it where it is.
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
  • Asas
    Asas Posts: 23 Forumite
    edited 12 June 2016 at 5:10PM
    I live in a floodplain area at the moment so I am trying to avoid it this time, even though it was never flooded. So even low risk shocked me. That area is not really considered with any risk of flood at all.

    I Think there is no way other than the structural survey if i would like to find out more about the house.

    Thank you for your replies.
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    Asas wrote: »
    I live in a floodplain area at the moment so I am trying to avoid it this time, even though it was never flooded. So even low risk shocked me. That area is not really considered with any risk of flood at all.

    I Think there is no way other than the structural survey if i would like to find out more about the house.

    Thank you for your replies.

    Put it this way, i live in a first floor flat and they claimed flood risk. No chance, short of the world ending. In a risk adverse and litigious society no one will sign off any property as zero risk.

    Whether you instruct the SS is down to how worried you are and how much you want the property.
  • Flyingpig
    Flyingpig Posts: 55 Forumite
    Asas wrote: »
    4. Flood risk comes as low but it did shock me since I thought is was Flood free.

    I live at the top of one of the highest hills in my area and because it was within 500m of a stream came back as high flood risk. You have seen the property and said you are shocked it came back as low risk. I would take it with a pinch of salt.
  • booksurr
    booksurr Posts: 3,700 Forumite
    Flyingpig wrote: »
    I live at the top of one of the highest hills in my area
    I hope you have a lightning conductor fitted or you will end up :eek: one day as it sounds like that is your risk, not flooding :D
  • booksurr
    booksurr Posts: 3,700 Forumite
    Asas wrote: »
    I am in the process of buying a 70s house. I think it was built in 1971 or 1972.

    Are there anything I should know before going any further into the process? Any potential troubles?

    My concerns are
    1. It has a flat roof, not 100% may be 75%? find out when it was last replaced as they will need going "regulalry" and it's a few £0,000 a time
    2. As the potential of natural ground subsidence is medium to high in the area and the house is positioned on the slight sloping land. I am worried about the subsidence already. so are we all, but what has this got to do with it being a '70s house?
    3. Asbestos. Is it so common in that era? leave it along and it won't matter. Without seeing the style of the house its impossible to say anything meaningful
    4. Flood risk comes as low but it did shock me since I thought is was Flood free. so are we all, but what has this got to do with it being a '70s house?

    I love the location of the house however I don't want to have troubles. Before I spend another £1000 on survey, are there anyone with 70s houses help me please?
    as above, good luck
  • Asas
    Asas Posts: 23 Forumite
    1. It was resurfaced in 2005.

    2. What I was trying to ask Initially was because it is 70s house, it might have a good foundation unlike the Victorian? So may be less likely to have subsidence? Also mid terraced means less risky? However I've realised it needs survey.

    3. I cannot see artex ceiling but it is a bit dated. Also down to survey I guess

    4. It is noting to do with 70s. Just my concern. After all, I don't think it will cause any trouble.

    I think I've just wanted someone to say that 70s house is fine and assure me in a way.

    Thanks a lot for your replies.
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    Asas wrote: »

    What I was trying to ask Initially was because it is 70s house, it might have a good foundation unlike the Victorian?

    Take the survey.

    The Victorian builds i've seen have been far superior to those afterwards. Their brickwork is unsurpassed.
  • Running_Horse
    Running_Horse Posts: 11,809 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    The only expensive issue I had in ten years in a 70s house was outdated plumbing and a new fuse box. Sure, stuff needs updating. But that will be the same in every era of housing. And having spent twenty years in a Victorian house...never again.
    Been away for a while.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.2K Life & Family
  • 255.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.