We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Leak from the flat above.
Comments
-
what happens if flat A above "accidently" leaves the tap on and goes on holiday. Flat B below is away for a few days. Flat A is flooded completely and destroys their floor and ceiling of flat B. the water floods flat B as well and all their possessions are ruined completely. Since it was an accident Flat B has to pay out of his own pocket all the expenses of the loss incurred due to the accident (assuming flat B has no contents insurance). Building insurance would cover the structural stuff for which any excess and premiums would be split 50-50 between flat A and B.
sounds really stupid and unfair to me. if i were flat B i would be fuming and being flat A i would seriously worry about flat B "accidently" killing flat A.0 -
Certainly you are right about 'just ask'. An amicable approach, and discussion, could result in an offer of compensation, whatever the law says.
you are wrong that leaseholders are not in contract with eachother. they are. each lease will specify it. eg leasee is obiged to ... with other leasees. this is effectively a legal contract between leasehodlers as well as with the freeholder.0 -
yes i support that idea, nice thinking0
-
what happens if flat A above "accidently" leaves the tap on and goes on holiday. Flat B below is away for a few days. Flat A is flooded completely and destroys their floor and ceiling of flat B. the water floods flat B as well and all their possessions are ruined completely. Since it was an accident Flat B has to pay out of his own pocket all the expenses of the loss incurred due to the accident (assuming flat B has no contents insurance). Building insurance would cover the structural stuff for which any excess and premiums would be split 50-50 between flat A and B.
sounds really stupid and unfair to me. if i were flat B i would be fuming and being flat A i would seriously worry about flat B "accidently" killing flat A.
That would be a clear case of negligence.0 -
and to get their own back what if flat B decides to go on holoday. has one of those old cookers with no safety so can leave the gas on (without ignition) the flat and buulding fills with gas. suddenly the whole buildign blows up killing flat A. Flat B maintains that it was an accident. so under the current law is not liable whatsoever for the death or financial losses incurred.0
-
That would be a clear case of negligence.
so i am confused. why is this negligence whereas someone leaving their bath tap on and sleeping and the water over flows is an accdent? they seem the same to me.
seems to me the law is stupid and useless and people on here dont know what they are talking about...0 -
Who does that, i don't support them to share it 50-50 all the blame is on flat A how could he accidentally forget to close tap, that is negligence0
-
JamesFenway wrote: »Who does that, i don't support them to share it 50-50 all the blame is on flat A how could he accidentally forget to close tap, that is negligence
apparently thats the way it is. its an accident. flat A is no way liable at all. makes you laugh doesnt it?0 -
It doesn't really matter what you think is logical or what you think should happen, the law disagrees with you.
In your scenario with A and B, if there is proof that A was negligible then B could have a claim against A, if not then B is going to be seriously out of pocket. Whichever way it went it would be very silly of B not to have contents insurance unless B could afford to self-insure.0 -
It doesn't really matter what you think is logical or what you think should happen, the law disagrees with you.
In your scenario with A and B, if there is proof that A was negligible then B could have a claim against A, if not then B is going to be seriously out of pocket. Whichever way it went it would be very silly of B not to have contents insurance unless B could afford to self-insure.
yes sometiems the law is full if !!!!!!. basically only ever buy a top floor flat and never buy in areas where your neighbours are going to be idiots.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards