We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Counterfeit or just poor title?
Options

Cuilean
Posts: 732 Forumite




I'm a phone geek, and I love Spigen's Neo Hybrid phone cases. They sell on Amazon for anywhere between £15-£20, and eBay for £7 upwards. Spigen have trademarked the name "Neo Hybrid".
In a momentary lapse of concentration, I bought what I thought was a Spigen Neo Hybrid case on eBay without looking at the pictures for the telltale signs of it being a copycat. It was listed as "Ultra Thin Neo Hybrid". No mention of Spigen. The cheap price alone should have been a warning, and I'm kicking myself for being so gullible. It arrived today, and sure enough, it's a cheap copy which doesn't even fit the phone properly. It was only £1.99, so it's probably not even worth sending it back.
Can I report it as a counterfeit since it's using Spigen's trademarked name of "Neo Hybrid", or do I just chalk this one up to experience and continue kicking myself?
In a momentary lapse of concentration, I bought what I thought was a Spigen Neo Hybrid case on eBay without looking at the pictures for the telltale signs of it being a copycat. It was listed as "Ultra Thin Neo Hybrid". No mention of Spigen. The cheap price alone should have been a warning, and I'm kicking myself for being so gullible. It arrived today, and sure enough, it's a cheap copy which doesn't even fit the phone properly. It was only £1.99, so it's probably not even worth sending it back.
Can I report it as a counterfeit since it's using Spigen's trademarked name of "Neo Hybrid", or do I just chalk this one up to experience and continue kicking myself?
© Cuilean 2005. Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.
0
Comments
-
I'd open a not as described case based on the fact it doesn't fit the phone. Counterfeit items are hard to prove.0
-
If it were a counterfeit one I imagine it'd say Spigen on it or something similar to catch people out.
They may have added neo hybrid to the title so their cases come up when people are searching for Spigen cases. However, it's also quite possible they don't have a clue it's trademarked and think it's just a general description for that type of case.
It'd be hard, if not impossible, to prove the case is a counterfeit as it appears to be a misleading/badly worded listing rather than anything on the item itself unless they've copied (almost) exact designs of the originals. A quick search seems to show the cases are pretty plain though so nothing much to copy if that's the case for all/most.
As above, you could open a not as described case.0 -
I'm a phone geek, and I love Spigen's Neo Hybrid phone cases. They sell on Amazon for anywhere between £15-£20, and eBay for £7 upwards. Spigen have trademarked the name "Neo Hybrid".
Can I report it as a counterfeit since it's using Spigen's trademarked name of "Neo Hybrid", or do I just chalk this one up to experience and continue kicking myself?
No they haven't. 'Spigen' is trademarked, but 'Neo Hybrid' isn't. Obviously not going to help you with your SNAD case (although I'd go with the doesn't fit scenario as others have said).
It does however mean that it can't be reported as counterfeit.0 -
bingo_bango wrote: »No they haven't. 'Spigen' is trademarked, but 'Neo Hybrid' isn't. Obviously not going to help you with your SNAD case (although I'd go with the doesn't fit scenario as others have said).
Hrm, maybe I misunderstood the law. They've registered it in the US. Guess that doesn't apply in the UK?
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4802:d7oxk3.2.1
So, SNAD it is. If I open an SNAD, am I liable for postage if it goes in my favour? I've never dealt with SNAD before.© Cuilean 2005. Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.0 -
Hrm, maybe I misunderstood the law. They've registered it in the US. Guess that doesn't apply in the UK?
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4802:d7oxk3.2.1
So, SNAD it is. If I open an SNAD, am I liable for postage if it goes in my favour? I've never dealt with SNAD before.
No, seller should pay postage.0 -
Hrm, maybe I misunderstood the law. They've registered it in the US. Guess that doesn't apply in the UK?
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4802:d7oxk3.2.1
So, SNAD it is. If I open an SNAD, am I liable for postage if it goes in my favour? I've never dealt with SNAD before.
Not really a misunderstanding, as it depends on where their market is. The US registration is only technically valid there. For it to have worldwide effect, it would also need to be registered with WIPO, which it isn't.
I do find that a little strange, as they have the Spigen mark registered with WIPO, so why not any others they own? May have been a cost issue, or that particular phone case might only have been intended for the US domestic market initially.
They may still be able to pursue a civil case in the UK for passing off, and that doesn't require TM registration in the UK (or with WIPO or anyone else for that matter). It might get you a little bonus if you contact them to let them know. The contact details will be on the IPO.gov.uk copy of the Spigen TM certificate.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards