WASPI Campaign .... State Pensions

jem16

uk1 wrote: »

Do you consider post #55 abusive and bullying and against the TOS?

Jeff

No I don't consider it to be either. He formed his opinion based on what you had already written earlier and it seemed a fair conclusion to draw.

As to TOS - not sure what that refers to but if you're referring to the Forum rules or etiquette then no I don't think it does either. However that's not really up to me to decide but up to you to report if you feel necessary.

uk1

jem16 wrote: »

No I don't consider it to be either. He formed his opinion based on what you had already written earlier and it seemed a fair conclusion to draw.

As to TOS - not sure what that refers to but if you're referring to the Forum rules or etiquette then no I don't think it does either.

So you do not at least see it as rude or abusive and against the forums rules. Fair enough. That view is clear.

There was absolutely nothing I have written that could imply let or alone prove that anything I had said was untruthful. It couldn't possibly be so because what I have said is true. You agreed with him so please point to posts that imply or show otherwise.

So to remove all doubt, you take very strong exception to having posts described by me as bullying but you feel it perfectly acceptable that you/and/or others call me a liar?

Jeff

jem16

uk1 wrote: »

So to remove all doubt, you take very strong exception to having posts described by me as bullying but you feel it perfectly acceptable that you/and/or others call me a liar?

Jeff

We're just going round in circles here. Please report any post that you feel abusive as I have already said.

Pollycat

uk1 wrote: »

You do not consider calling me a liar is abusive and against the TOS and therefore breaking the rules? You do not see why on balance it is best not to call someone a liar?

uk1 wrote: »

So to remove all doubt, you take very strong exception to having posts described by me as bullying but you feel it perfectly acceptable that you/and/or others call me a liar?

Can you please clarify where you've been called a liar.

I've re-read the thread from when you joined the discussion but can't see it (but I am now on my phone so may have missed it).

uk1

Pollycat wrote: »

Can you please clarify where you've been called a liar.

I've re-read the thread from when you joined the discussion but can't see it (but I am now on my phone so may have missed it).

Yes, I think I can see where this is going!:D

When you get off the phone, have a look at 55 and give it your best shot at arguing that this wasn't calling me a liar.



Jeff

uk1

jem16 wrote: »

We're just going round in circles here. Please report any post that you feel abusive as I have already said.

Indeed. And so should you.



Jeff

missbiggles1

uk1 wrote: »

Yes, I think I can see where this is going!:D

When you get off the phone, have a look at 55 and give it your best shot at arguing that this wasn't calling me a liar.



Jeff

We've all read it and nobody except you thinks that you were being called a liar. You may not like being told that you're "posting from a position of ignorance" but that isn't saying that you told lies.

uk1

missbiggles1 wrote: »

We've all read it and nobody except you thinks that you were being called a liar. You may not like being told that you're "posting from a position of ignorance" but that isn't saying that you told lies.

Thanks for speaking on everyone elses behalf and explaining it to me.



Jeff

missbiggles1

uk1 wrote: »

Thanks for speaking on everyone elses behalf and explaining it to me.



Jeff

One minute you're demanding minute explanations, the next you object to them. I'd call you inconsistent but you'd think I was bullying you.;):D

Pollycat

uk1 wrote: »

Yes, I think I can see where this is going!:D

When you get off the phone, have a look at 55 and give it your best shot at arguing that this wasn't calling me a liar.



Jeff

OK.
I've read and re-read post #55 and I really can't see where that poster called you a 'liar'.

missbiggles1 wrote: »

We've all read it and nobody except you thinks that you were being called a liar. You may not like being told that you're "posting from a position of ignorance" but that isn't saying that you told lies.

I agree.

uk1 wrote: »

Thanks for speaking on everyone elses behalf and explaining it to me.



Jeff

Well, I'm not sure if missbiggles 'spoke' on my behalf but I do agree with her point.