General Parking and Landowner Authority

Fruitcake

Quentin wrote: »

Link no good

It works OK for me.

fabs35

1st time I've used an image hosting site. Try again...


http://s1082.photobucket.com/user/fabs35/media/Manipulated%20entrance%20photo%20from%20PDUK_zpsjktirxtn.jpg.html

fabs35

Fruitcake wrote: »

Is that your picture, or the one where you allege the parking scumpany has imposed another sign onto it? That's the one we really want to see.

That was the one I took. The second one (with the yellow circles) is the version the PPC submitted to POPLA.

Quentin

fabs35 wrote: »

1st time I've used an image hosting site. Try again...


http://s1082.photobucket.com/user/fabs35/media/Manipulated%20entrance%20photo%20from%20PDUK_zpsjktirxtn.jpg.html

Still:

Sorry. This person moved or deleted this image

.

fabs35

http://s1082.photobucket.com/user/fabs35/slideshow/

Quentin

fabs35 wrote: »

http://s1082.photobucket.com/user/fabs35/slideshow/

Perfection

nigelbb

Aside from the doctoring of photographs that is surely criminal (attempting to gain pecuniary advantage by deception i.e. fraud) if the signs state “unauthorised vehicles strictly no stopping/ waiting or parking” then there is no offer of parking therefore the OP cannot have entered into a contract & can therefore have breached no T&Cs. Here is a similar case where a judge held that 'forbidding' sings are not capable of offering a contract. Without a contract the OP becomes a trespasser & it is open to the occupier of the land to sue not a PPC http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/bargepole-spanks-ukpc-in-court-no.html

Coupon-mad

Same situation as here:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5402484

But WH (posing as POPLA) got it right. We know 'new' (Ombudsman) POPLA is inconsistent and it is a lottery - some Assessors do not have a clue, basically:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/70763316#Comment_70763316

As I said on that first thread, it would be interesting if these posters get a threatogram from WH!

Anyone who gets a dodgy POPLA decision needs to complaint to complaints@ POPLA and then complain to ISPA. Fabs35, I am sure Chinaski will pm you their POPLA code to use as an example of the same site (same sort of site) same ticket, different POPLA outcome. UNFAIR for consumers and causes them loss if they then pay (you do not have to pay unless a Judge tells you to).

patman99

The PPC-submitted photo has definately been photo-shopped.
Check out the sign on the leftmost part of the image (the one in front of the yellow 'No stopping or waiting at any time' sign).
It does not appear to be attached to anything at all. It is simply hanging in mid air.

Also, the sign attached to the bottom right post of the big, main sign would not normally be mounted down that low. They would normally mount the sign on it's own pole if no space is available on the main sign.

Marktheshark

The "signs" have been inserted in to a jpeg file as giff files and the image saved again as a jpeg the image is a most obvious and very poorly done fake.

This should be reported to the police it is deliberate and intentional breach of the fraud act.