We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Residential Parking Problems
Comments
-
If you are preventing a vehicle being moved then you are obstructing that road user in his lawful right to use the road0
-
There again there is always anti social behaviour legislation to fall back on as well0
-
In your opinionANURADHA KOIRALA ??? go on throw it in google.0
-
unforeseen wrote: »If you are preventing a vehicle being moved then you are obstructing that road user in his lawful right to use the road
Any official links to that or examples of prosecutions.ANURADHA KOIRALA ??? go on throw it in google.0 -
OH NO how awful for you.I do exactly what the OP is complaining about. Although I have a driveway, I pay full road tax (or whatever you want to call it) and am entitled to park on the road. If at all possible I will park outside my house or elsewhere in the road and leave the driveway empty for my second car when it returns home. If I don't park there then someone who doesn't even live in the road will!0 -
Not in the exact words that your are looking forAny official links to that or examples of prosecutions.
My mistake but it should have been Section 42 Road Traffic Act 1988
http://www.cabinet.leicester.gov.uk/documents/s63157/Evidence%20-%20Police.pdf
It is a very real and unnecessary obstruction to another road user AND somebody will have made a formal complaint so it is prosecutableUnless the vehicle is causing a very real and unnecessary obstruction to other road users and somebody has made formal complaint, then prosecution action should not ordinarily follow.
I am sorry but I do not have an encyclopedic knowledge of the S42 offences dealt with by the courts in the last 10 years so am unable to give specific instances.0 -
unforeseen wrote: »Not in the exact words that your are looking for
My mistake but it should have been Section 42 Road Traffic Act 1988
http://www.cabinet.leicester.gov.uk/documents/s63157/Evidence%20-%20Police.pdf
It is a very real and unnecessary obstruction to another road user AND somebody will have made a formal complaint so it is prosecutable
I am sorry but I do not have an encyclopedic knowledge of the S42 offences dealt with by the courts in the last 10 years so am unable to give specific instances.
You don't need a formal complaint to prosecute that offence.0 -
Makes it even easier to get action taken thenSilver-Surfer wrote: »You don't need a formal complaint to prosecute that offence.0 -
unforeseen wrote: »Makes it even easier to get action taken then
It's easy enough to prosecute without.0 -
Can't see anything wrong with what he is doing, I would also have "no shame" in doing it, and wouldn't care who was watching. Life is short, I wouldn't get stressed about such trivial things.
But you'd get stressed having to walk a bit further if there was no spaces and you had to park elsewhere. Ironic really0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
