PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Let and rent?

Options
I am wondering whether to adopt a 'best of both' strategy. I decided to let out my only flat last year with consent to let and had the intention of buying another flat to live in at some point. Right now I am just renting a room and saving a fair bit each month, but I cannot stay here much longer, plus I want my own space back.

However, due to the stamp duty increase and mortgage costs I have worked out it will cost well over £10k in fees alone to achieve the original plan. That's just £7500 stamp duty and £2000 buy to let mortgage fee. There would also be the fees for getting my own mortgage on the new flat.

So I am wondering whether to rent a small one bedroom flat, for the same sort of price as the rent I am receiving on my first flat is. This would kind of be a best of both worlds situation as I could still be on the property ladder but also have the freedom to move if I wanted. My flat now is let to someone who has settled in and wants to stay for the long term.

Does this sound like it could work, or should I stick to my original plan of buying a second flat and take the hit in fees? It just seems crazy to pay over a years worth of rent in fees just to get the keys to a second flat?

Thanks for all replies, Chris

Comments

  • I would buy and pay the fees, in a year or two prices could rise and cover the cost of the fees. If you rent that will only go up in years to come. So i don't think your best of both idea is that good.
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,572 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If you can live in your own property (e.g., it's the right size, right location, and you can legally evict the tenant) then it's much more sensible to do this than rent somewhere. The reason being, for CGT purposes, you're entitled to principal private residence relief on your own home.

    The fact the tenant seems settled is not a good reason to hand HMRC £7,500 in stamp duty.
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
  • I think if the OP has enough equity to put at least 25% down on each property then in the long term it should pay off, the tenant pays the mortgage on the first one and OP lives in the second with a lower payment as a mortgage than the cost of renting privately.
  • zagubov
    zagubov Posts: 17,937 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    We did this when we were moving once. It's complicated.
    Our tenants were good and we had to get an accountant to look after the tax.

    We were still househunting and couldn't get a second tenant in when our first was ready to move it (it was a six-month let). Left us with a void and made us get our skates on to move.

    Nobody was trying to make trouble for us but it was still troublesome being both a landlord and a tenant. Had to replace broken washing machine, delivery men let us down. Landlord's gf wanted him to sell, with us moving out early.

    It was helpful for us as our house had gone up in value much more than the houses we were looking to buy. We also found out that we couldn't get used to a really great house that was in a dead location. Worth it for us, probably not for everybody.

    Have you room to take in a lodger? That might be a better (and definitely easier) step to more money with less of the hassle.
    There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker
  • Depends if OP wants to live with someone. It might make sense to sell your flat and buy a new house with as many rooms as you can afford to rent to lodgers?
  • chrishar
    chrishar Posts: 178 Forumite
    Thanks for your opinions. I would rather live by myself so lodger is probably out of the question. I feel a bit unsure about paying rent but then I think I am receiving rent as well which offsets it. Plus I remain on the property ladder. Buying a second property feels like a big commitment and the fees are high which I'll never get back. In the long term it could be a good investment though.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.