We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
querying PCN & Notice to Keeper
Comments
-
Hi Coupon-mad thank you for that link, it's really useful particularly the ECP response, I'll be reading through again later and getting pointers for mine.
I see that the appeal was won on singly no land owner authority though as the site was leased. In my case the site is owned by ECP so I don't think I can use that point can I?0 -
Leasehold title is ownership for a certain time under a lease. Freehold title is an 'overall' land ownership. I doubt ECP own the freehold?PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Coupon-mad wrote: »Leasehold title is ownership for a certain time under a lease. Freehold title is an 'overall' land ownership. I doubt ECP own the freehold?
The Land Registry online title deed names ECPL as the registered owners unfortunately.
I'm still getting my appeal statement together but have just looked on the POPLA appeal website and see that you can select various reasons for appealing se pic http://s396.photobucket.com/user/AJH162/media/Screen%20Shot%202016-07-09%20at%2007.53.28.png.html?filters[user]=84882820&filters[recent]=1&sort=1&o=0.
Which one is best to choose? I'll be appealing in my son's name I guess so will be publishing his name and address. Presumably this is ok?
Thanks again0 -
Use 'Other'.
I haven't read back through the entire thread, but is your son the registered keeper?Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
OK, so if name and postal address is required by POPLA - provide that. If an email addy will suffice provide that - he/you could open a new throwaway account with hotmail or gmail, if you want to keep the PCN/POPLA stuff away from normal email.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
ok, understood.
I'm basing my appeal statements on the excellent link which Coupon-mad sent- https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5470992.
Mine will be a bit different though as contesting the ANPR images will be the main point as they are cropped images and no demonstrable connection with the car park. The thing that's puzzling me though is that in order to capture a car crossing the boundary from the car park back to the street, the camera must have been positioned directly across the street so presumably from a stationery vehicle. Does this have implications do you think re the BPA code of conduct?
Many thanks for your response0 -
Does this have implications do you think re the BPA code of conduct?
Unlikely. This is not a regulated industry, the BPA themselves confirm this, but decided not mention it to the Supreme Court who believe that the BPA Code of Practice is 'essentially binding'.
Welcome to the rodeo!Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
The only fair way to charge for parking would appear to be ticket on entry and then pay on exit for the time elapsed. About time that parking was regulated, time to get a govt petition launched maybe if it hasn't already...
I see that POPLA is administered by The Ombudsman Service Ltd, I wonder how impartial and independent they are?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards