MSE News: Mega merger between Three and O2 blocked amid price rise concerns

MSE_Luke
MSE_Luke Posts: 295 MSE Staff
Fourth Anniversary
A multi-billion pound merger between O2 and Three has been blocked over concerns about potential customer price rises...
Read the full story:
'Mega merger between Three and O2 blocked amid price rise concerns'
OfficialStamp.gif
Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
«1

Comments

  • torbrex
    torbrex Posts: 71,340 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker Rampant Recycler Hung up my suit!
    edited 11 May 2016 at 5:34PM
    and today O2 announced that their PAYG prices are changing later this month.
  • Ian011
    Ian011 Posts: 2,432 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The reason cited was 'competition'.

    Competition isn't working. When one network raises their prices, all of the others follow. Competition is supposed to bring prices down.
  • Ectophile
    Ectophile Posts: 7,859 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    "Competition" just means you match your prices to everybody else's.

    If you cut your prices, then all your competitors would have to follow suit. Once they have done that, you won't attract any new customers. Instead, you've just lost profits by cutting prices.
    If it sticks, force it.
    If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.
  • sdduk
    sdduk Posts: 1,436 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic
    I can understand UK not wanting it and stopping it going though but whats it got to do with the EU?:mad:
    I think the quicker we leave the better off this country will be.
    Nobody is Perfect. I am Nobody, therefore I am Perfect.
    :)
  • jobdone1
    jobdone1 Posts: 841 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    So what's the difference with the Ee merger ???,
  • wongataa
    wongataa Posts: 2,683 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    jobdone1 wrote: »
    So what's the difference with the Ee merger ???,
    EE and BT mainly operated in different areas. EE didn't have much landline market and BT didn't have much mobile market, so when they joined there was little reduction in competition overall. As O2 and 3 operate in the same market (mobile telecoms) having them merge definitely does reduce the available competition.
  • ChiefGrasscutter
    ChiefGrasscutter Posts: 2,112 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The rational between the BT/EE merger being allowed was that it did not reduce the number of mobile phone companies in the UK as BT does not have a mobile arm.
    A merger between Three and O2 would reduce the number from 4 to 3

    As per my comment on the other thread, time will tell whether the UK is large enough to sustain 4 mobile networks as now seemingly demanded by the EU.
    If not then one of them will eventually wither and die being left on some minimal maintenance basis.
    This sort of thing happened to a division within a company I worked for. Eventually most the staff left to work for the competitors and finally it was closed down and the rest made redundant. Effectively they had "sold" the division to the competitors but got no money for it.

    Anyway its just yet another reason to vote leave - the EU interfering in our business.
  • redux
    redux Posts: 22,976 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Anyway its just yet another reason to vote leave - the EU interfering in our business.

    The UK regulators recommended against the merger, and the EU authorities backed them up.

    What difference could not being in the EU have possibly made to this decision?
  • Gigabit
    Gigabit Posts: 13 Forumite
    All not being in the EU would have done was to get to the decision quicker. It's good IMO to have multiple authorities coming to one reasoned, correct decision.
  • ChiefGrasscutter
    ChiefGrasscutter Posts: 2,112 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    redux wrote: »
    The UK regulators recommended against the merger, and the EU authorities backed them up.
    What difference could not being in the EU have possibly made to this decision?


    The UK regulators will have had unofficial discussions with the EU regulators - of that I'm quite sure.
    When the EU unofficially indicated that they were most likely to block it then OFCOM would have rapidly come to the same conclusion.
    Its a bit like you knowing what you boss is going to say about some plan and rapidly decide to toe the line and hurriedly agree.

    This way we don't get into a disagreement between the EU/OFCOM and HMG can spout some guff about how it all shows how we are working together.

    Unfortunately it means that OFOM is most likely to be singing to the tune of the EU and what the EU wants rather than focusing its attention where it should be - on what the UK market wants.....which is some mega player to compete with the might of BT/EE.

    Incidentally the Telecoms EU Commissioner seems to agree with my viewpoint from his previous statements about mega players being essential but was presumably overruled/outvoted/stabbed in the back by the competition commissioner.
    http://uk.reuters.com/article/europe-telecoms-consolidation-oettinger-idUKF9N0ZM00J20151028
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.