We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tenancy Agreement Clauses
Options
Comments
-
Only when it is reasonably required.
Remember that the claimant must mitigate costs where possible. For a straight forward s.21 possession a solicitor is not required.
It is always reasonable to use a lawyer to deal with legal matters.
The level of wishful thinking and delusion is unbelievable!0 -
Miss_Samantha wrote: »It is always reasonable to use a lawyer to deal with legal matters.
The level of wishful thinking and delusion is unbelievable!
2 words:
Small Claims0 -
-
-
Miss_Samantha wrote: »Come on, let's stop the nonsense.
Benjus quoted the wrong section.
Section 11 applies in any case and contains the same provision on access rights as he quoted.
Sorry, I thought this thread was about allowing the landlord or his/her agent to show potential tenants around the property in the last 2 months of the tenancy.:footie:Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S)
Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money.
0 -
Miss_Samantha wrote: »In which you are still perfectly entitled to use a solicitor.
Are you bent on keeping on digging or finding random examples?
https://www.stephensons.co.uk/site/individuals/srvdisputes/small_claims_guide/small_claims/
Solicitors own website advertising their services even says it's generally not recoverable in SC0 -
https://www.stephensons.co.uk/site/individuals/srvdisputes/small_claims_guide/small_claims/
Solicitors own website advertising their services even says it's generally not recoverable in SC
There are limited, like e.g. in the accelerated possession procedure. However, this does not apply to normal possession proceedings.
If a breach of tenancy is pursed in small claims, the tenant would still need to defend, which would be costly in time or cash.
So as I said... keep digging and looking for random examples instead of giving reasonable advice.0 -
Miss_Samantha wrote: »There are limited, like e.g. in the accelerated possession procedure. However, this does not apply to normal possession proceedings.
If a breach of tenancy is pursed in small claims, the tenant would still need to defend, which would be costly in time or cash.
So as I said... keep digging and looking for random examples instead of giving reasonable advice.
If a breach of tenancy was pursued via the small claims, the LL would not be seeking possession, but recovering a loss or cost, a quantified amount.
Which means a LL has already sent a LBA outlining the case. And has already offered mediation.
After all that, it's still not reasonable to use a solicitor, and the court may pass judgement in the first hearing, or decide to pass judgement based upon the court papers received.
And even if both parties are required to attend in person, the costs in small claims are limited, for a very good reason.
- to stop people being bullied into settling out of court.0 -
I thought as a landlord all you could claim for was a maximum of £90 per day for attending court for lost wages plus reasonable travel expenses. Even if you're paid a salary of £40,000 a year and therefore lose £150 by taking the day off as an unpaid day the limit is just £90 per day. If you take a paid day off or don't work (i.e claiming a pension and the property is a source of income) and therefore don't lose wages by attending court you can't claim anything as you haven't lost anything.
As far as reasonable travel expenses are concerned I would really doubt that means a landlord could fly from Edinburgh to Birmingham to attend court and expect the tenant to pay.:footie:Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S)
Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards