We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
First Time Owner Occupier - Higher Rate Stamp Duty

Raymondo84_2
Posts: 11 Forumite
Hi,
I've rented for several years after uni, and hoping to buy a property in the coming months to become an owner occupier.
My issue is that I do currently have a share on two other properties, both are co-owned with family. I haven't ever lived in either of these, they have never been a main residence, and the council tax records will show that they've been occupied with tenants since they were purchased 4 years ago. And my council tax records show that I've paid council tax on various properties I've rented over several years.
I've studied the guidance, and I'm still not entirely sure how this effects me. There is condition D which I believe doesn't apply in my case, as the new property is replacing my rented main residence;
"the dwelling being purchased is not replacing the purchaser’s only or main residence"
Has anyone seen anything in the guidance which covers this? Or have any idea how this will be viewed by HMRC?
I've rented for several years after uni, and hoping to buy a property in the coming months to become an owner occupier.
My issue is that I do currently have a share on two other properties, both are co-owned with family. I haven't ever lived in either of these, they have never been a main residence, and the council tax records will show that they've been occupied with tenants since they were purchased 4 years ago. And my council tax records show that I've paid council tax on various properties I've rented over several years.
I've studied the guidance, and I'm still not entirely sure how this effects me. There is condition D which I believe doesn't apply in my case, as the new property is replacing my rented main residence;
"the dwelling being purchased is not replacing the purchaser’s only or main residence"
Has anyone seen anything in the guidance which covers this? Or have any idea how this will be viewed by HMRC?
0
Comments
-
You already own properties and you are buying another, so you'll be liable for the extra.0
-
You currently own two properties.
If you buy a new one for any reason, you will own three.
You then have to pay the 3% surcharge.
Your current rented property is of zero relevance to this formula.0 -
Where the new house replaces a rental home then you're liable. If you were selling your main residence and buying another residence it wouldn't be applicable. Not really sure I fully follow their logic, but that was the guidance I read on the subject.0
-
I've read about the new house replacing a rental home on the zoopla interpretation of the guidance but I couldn't see that in HMRC's guidance. All I could see was the following which I interpret as protecting renters
"3.24 Renting a new main residence in the time between disposal and purchase will not prevent the purchase from being a replacement of a main residence unless the period of the tenancy agreed is more than seven years."
The guidance refers to two elements of Condition D;
1. The disposal of a previous Main residence
2. The dwelling acquired must be intended to be occupied as the individual’s only or main residence
The rented property is, from what I understand, my main residence. The dwelling I'm purchasing is going to replace my residence (their is a big emphasis on main residence).
As I understand it, as long as you are replacing a main residence (relocating, moving) then you won't be eligible to pay the higher rate providing that your old main residence is being disposed of to stop building up portfolio's by moving on regularly.0 -
Raymondo84 wrote: »I do currently have a share on two other properties0
-
Raymondo84 wrote: »I've read about the new house replacing a rental home on the zoopla interpretation of the guidance but I couldn't see that in HMRC's guidance. All I could see was the following which I interpret as protecting renters
"3.24 Renting a new main residence in the time between disposal and purchase will not prevent the purchase from being a replacement of a main residence unless the period of the tenancy agreed is more than seven years."
The guidance refers to two elements of Condition D;
1. The disposal of a previous Main residence
2. The dwelling acquired must be intended to be occupied as the individual’s only or main residence
The rented property is, from what I understand, my main residence. The dwelling I'm purchasing is going to replace my residence (their is a big emphasis on main residence).
As I understand it, as long as you are replacing a main residence (relocating, moving) then you won't be eligible to pay the higher rate providing that your old main residence is being disposed of to stop building up portfolio's by moving on regularly.
As mentioned before, you are liable.0 -
First time owner occupier! I've never owned my main residence,0
-
The HMRC guidance states otherwise. It specifically states that you have to be selling/gifting/disposing of your previous residence for it to qualify.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/consultation-on-higher-rates-of-stamp-duty-land-tax-sdlt-on-purchases-of-additional-residential-properties/higher-rates-of-stamp-duty-land-tax-sdlt-on-purchases-of-additional-residential-properties#introduction
It also explains the logic behind their move - it stops people buying a first buy to let before owning their own home. And then renting another property for 6 months and then buying a second property and replacing their rental property with it as their main residence (which is actually quite sensible!).0 -
Raymondo84 wrote: »First time owner occupier! I've never owned my main residence,0
-
Raymondo it looks pretty unanimous here, if you think there's legally a different answer, you'd best check with your solicitor.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards