PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

stamo duty homes in different names

How does the stamo duty on second homes come into effect if the main residence is one mortgagee and the other is under my partner? Ie I sell my house buy another he moves in but keeps his but changes it to buy to let but in effect is only named as mortgagee on the btl property.

Comments

  • redhead123
    redhead123 Posts: 171 Forumite
    We are not married...so not sure if that makes a difference
    If we then put both houses in both names i guess that would
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You own one property.

    He owns one property.

    What's the question?

    Does he know what's involved?

    * New landlords: advice, information & links

    * Letting agents: how should a landlord select or sack?
  • redhead123
    redhead123 Posts: 171 Forumite
    I guess the question is whether we can keep his house without laying the extra SD. Scenario 1) if we sell mine and I buy he lives in the new one with me he keeps his and we use the rental income to pay part of new mortgage do we still have to pay stamp duty? 2) as above but add names a good while after the sale has gone through maybe a year or so to give us time to save the extra SD 2) we sell mine keep his put both our names on I guess we do need to pay stamp duty up front ? 3) sell both houses
  • Azure11
    Azure11 Posts: 42 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    redhead123 wrote: »
    I guess the question is whether we can keep his house without laying the extra SD. Scenario 1) if we sell mine and I buy he lives in the new one with me he keeps his and we use the rental income to pay part of new mortgage do we still have to pay stamp duty? 2) as above but add names a good while after the sale has gone through maybe a year or so to give us time to save the extra SD 2) we sell mine keep his put both our names on I guess we do need to pay stamp duty up front ? 3) sell both houses

    I think you have answered your own question.

    If either one of you owns another home when you buy the second one (and put both names on it) then the extra 3% will apply as I understand it.
  • booksurr
    booksurr Posts: 3,700 Forumite
    redhead123 wrote: »
    How does the stamo duty on second homes come into effect if the main residence is one mortgagee and the other is under my partner? Ie I sell my house buy another he moves in but keeps his but changes it to buy to let but in effect is only named as mortgagee on the btl property.
    you own a property (A) and are going to sell it and become the owner of the new property (B), The one being sold (A) is currently your main residence and the new one (B) will be its replacement

    he owns a separate property (C). He will NOT be an owner of B and is not on its mortgage. He intends to convert C into a BTL

    SDLT on purchase of B by you
    you are replacing your existing main residence in a single transaction with no gap between sale and purchase. As a result the higher rate SDLT will not apply to you
    He is not an owner and crucially you are not married therefore he is not a party to the transaction as your are both separate individuals and he has no legal interest in property B

    putting him on the mortgage at a later date

    if you do so (whether married or not by that time) he will be liable to the higher rate since he already owns a property and is not replacing his main residence, he is simply acquiring another property, even though it will become his main residence. Therefore, if at the point he is added to the mortgage the amount outstanding on it is more than £40k he is above the threshold at which the higher rate will apply

    read the guide, it's readily available on line...
    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/509184/GuidanceNote_Final.pdf
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.